Cited by 24Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Activity of VT-1129 against Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolates with high fluconazole MICs

Nielsen, Kirsten, Vedula, Priya, Smith, Kyle D., Meya, David B., Garvey, Edward P., Hoekstra, William J., Schotzinger, Robert J., Boulware, David R.·2016·Medical Mycology

Abstract

Although antifungal drug resistance in the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans is relatively uncommon, fluconazole-resistant strains are problematic for preemptive treatment of cryptococcal antigenemia or during cryptococcal meningitis consolidation therapy. We analyzed activity of the experimental antifungal VT-1129 on 51 clinical Cryptococcus neoformans isolates previously screened for fluconazole resistance; with an emphasis on fluconazole dose-dependent (MIC 16-32 μg/ml) or resistant (MIC ≥ 64 μg/ml) isolates. Overall, the VT-1129 geometric mean MIC was 0.027 μg/ml. The VT-1129 MIC50 was 0.05 μg/ml and 0.25 μg/ml for dose-dependent (n = 27) and resistant isolates (n = 6), respectively. These data suggest VT-1129 shows potential for use against fluconazole-resistant Cryptococcus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mmy/myw089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VT-1129 is an oral tetrazole with robust in vitro and in vivo efficacy against C. neoformans and C. gattii, maintaining activity (mean MIC 0.027 μg/mL) against fluconazole-resistant or dose-dependent C. neoformans isolates.

    “Preclinical studies have demonstrated robust in vitro and in vivo efficacy against C. neoformans and C. gattii, notably maintaining activity (mean MIC 0.027 μg/mL) against fluconazole-resistant or dose-dependent C. neoformans isolates (Fig. 1) [92–94].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 24

Authors
Nielsen, K., Vedula, P., Smith, K. D., Meya, D. B., Garvey, E. P., Hoekstra, W. J., Schotzinger, R. J., & Boulware, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Infectious Diseases Institute (UG)
  • Viamet Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Nielsen, Kirsten
Venue
Medical Mycology
Published
2016-09-24
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
myw089
ISSN
  • 0268-1218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-3786
  • 1460-2709
OpenAlex
W2521669060
Cited by
24
References
16
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Mycology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
Cryptococcus neoformans, fluconazole resistance, antifungal susceptibility, minimum inhibitory concentration, dose-dependent resistance, cryptococcal meningitis, cryptococcal antigenemia, antifungal resistance
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Cryptococcosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Pyridines, Tetrazoles, Fluconazole, Drug Resistance, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review