Cited by 264Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesActinomycetales infections and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 259 of the 259 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scedosporium and Lomentospora: an updated overview of underrated opportunists

Open access
Ramirez-Garcia, Andoni, Pellon, Aize, Rementeria, Aitor, Buldain, Idoia, Barreto-Bergter, Eliana, Rollin-Pinheiro, Rodrigo, de Meirelles, Jardel Vieira, Xisto, Mariana Ingrid D S, Ranque, Stephane, Havlicek, Vladimir, Vandeputte, Patrick, Govic, Yohann Le, Bouchara, Jean-Philippe, Giraud, Sandrine, Chen, Sharon, Rainer, Johannes, Alastruey-Izquierdo, Ana, Martin-Gomez, Maria Teresa, López-Soria, Leyre M, Peman, Javier, Schwarz, Carsten, Bernhardt, Anne, Tintelnot, Kathrin, Capilla, Javier, Martin-Vicente, Adela, Cano-Lira, Jose, Nagl, Markus, Lackner, Michaela, Irinyi, Laszlo, Meyer, Wieland, de Hoog, Sybren, Hernando, Fernando L·2018·Medical Mycology

Abstract

Species of Scedosporium and Lomentospora are considered as emerging opportunists, affecting immunosuppressed and otherwise debilitated patients, although classically they are known from causing trauma-associated infections in healthy individuals. Clinical manifestations range from local infection to pulmonary colonization and severe invasive disease, in which mortality rates may be over 80%. These unacceptably high rates are due to the clinical status of patients, diagnostic difficulties, and to intrinsic antifungal resistance of these fungi. In consequence, several consortia have been founded to increase research efforts on these orphan fungi. The current review presents recent findings and summarizes the most relevant points, including the Scedosporium/Lomentospora taxonomy, environmental distribution, epidemiology, pathology, virulence factors, immunology, diagnostic methods, and therapeutic strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mmy/myx113

Cites

259 of 259 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 259 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rodriguez-Tudela, 2009, Epidemiology and outcome of Scedosporium prolificans infection, a review of 162 cases, Med Mycol, 47, 359, 10.1080/13693780802524506 · DOI
  2. Sedlacek, 2015, Prevalence of Scedosporium species and Lomentospora prolificans in patients with cystic fibrosis in a multicenter trial by use of a selective medium, J Cyst Fibros, 14, 237, 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.12.014 · DOI
  3. Nagl, 2013, Tolerability of inhaled N-chlorotaurine versus sodium chloride in the mouse, J Med Res Pract, 2, 163

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ramirez-Garcia, A., Pellon, A., Rementeria, A., Buldain, I., Barreto-Bergter, E., Rollin-Pinheiro, R., de Meirelles, J. V., Xisto, M. I. D. S., Ranque, S., Havlicek, V., Vandeputte, P., Govic, Y. L., Bouchara, J.-P., Giraud, S., Chen, S., Rainer, J., Alastruey-Izquierdo, A., Martin-Gomez, M. T., López-Soria, L. M., Peman, J., Schwarz, C., Bernhardt, A., Tintelnot, K., Capilla, J., Martin-Vicente, A., Cano-Lira, J., Nagl, M., Lackner, M., Irinyi, L., Meyer, W., de Hoog, S., & Hernando, F. L.
Affiliations
  • Fungal and Bacterial Biomics Research Group, Department of Immunology, Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
  • Instituto de Microbiologia, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
  • Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, AP-HM / CHU Timone, Marseille, France
  • Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (FR)
  • Université d'Angers (FR)
  • Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, ICPMR, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • Mycology Reference Laboratory, National Centre for Microbiology. Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
  • Microbiology Department. Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
  • Microbiology Department. Hospital Universitario Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain
  • Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Robert Koch Institute (DE)
  • Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (ES)
  • Mycology Unit, Medical School and IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • Molecular Mycology Research Laboratory, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Clinical School, Sydney Medical School – Westmead Hospital, Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, The University of Sydney, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Venue
Medical Mycology
Published
2018-03-10
Volume
56
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
S102-S125
ISSN
  • 0268-1218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-3786
  • 1460-2709
OpenAlex
W2789742163
Cited by
264
References
259
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 9
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Mycology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Czech Science Foundation (16-20229S)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (APP1031952, APP1121936)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Actinomycetales infections and treatment
Keywords
Scedosporium, opportunistic fungal infection, emerging fungal pathogens, immunocompromised patients, invasive fungal infections, antifungal resistance, fungal taxonomy, virulence factors, fungal immunology, fungal infection diagnosis, antifungal therapy, environmental distribution, lung colonization
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Ascomycota, Combined Modality Therapy, Ecology, Humans, Mycoses, Opportunistic Infections, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Immunocompromised Host, Scedosporium, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Fungal, Virulence Factors, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Molecular Typing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review