The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolution and clustering of rich clusters
Open accessAbstract
In some hierarchical theories for galaxy formation the present evolution of the clustering pattern should approximate that which arises from scale-free initial conditions. The characteristic mass-scale of clustering is predicted to be evolving very rapidly, so we can hope to test these hypotheses by observations of clustering at quite accessible redshifts. We extend the well-known scaling laws for the dimensional quantities which characterize the clustering to give quantitative formulae for the evolution of general cluster catalogues. We show that X-ray selected clusters should display strong positive density evolution, with the characteristic luminosity, L*, remaining roughly constant. The comoving number density of clusters selected according to a criterion like Abell's should, on the other hand, remain roughly constant. Core radii should be much smaller in the past, and the gravitational lensing power of these clusters should be greater than for an unevolving population of clusters. Consideration is given to processes which will modify the self-similar scaling results. A corollary of the rapid evolution in these models is that small-amplitude, long-wavelength density perturbations will spatially modulate the clustering process, resulting in an enhancement of the correlation function for optically selected clusters, ξc, relative to the density correlation function ξϱ. The enhancement factor |$\xi_\text c/\xi_\varrho$| can be expressed in terms of the spectral index of the initial fluctuations and the present logarithmic slope of the mass distribution function of rich clusters. Estimates of the latter, combined with the observed clustering lengths of galaxies and rich clusters, require a spectral index |$n\simeq-1.5$|. A similar analysis applied to X-ray selected clusters suggests that these should be less strongly clustered than the optically selected clusters, though this result is sensitive to uncertainty in the slope of the X-ray luminosity function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CHANDRA CLUSTER COSMOLOGY PROJECT. II. SAMPLES AND X-RAY DATA REDUCTION
Vikhlinin, A., Burenin, R. A., Ebeling, H., Forman, W. R., Hornstrup, A., Jones, C., Kravtsov, A. V., Murray, S. S., Nagai, D., Quintana, H., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/692/2/1033 · Cited by 722
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
The Evolution of X-Ray Clusters of Galaxies
Rosati, P., Borgani, S., & Norman, C. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.120401.150547 · Cited by 482
The Evolution of X‐Ray Clusters in a Low‐Density Universe
Eke, V. R., Navarro, J. F., & Frenk, C. S. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306008 · Cited by 441
Bocquet, S., Dietrich, J. P., Schrabback, T., Bleem, L. E., Klein, M., Allen, S. W., Applegate, D. E., Ashby, M. L. N., Bautz, M., Bayliss, M., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f10 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaiser, N.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 222
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 323-345
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1986350100
- Cited by
- 795
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution and clustering of rich clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/222.2.323
- The paper
- Kaiser, N. (1986). Evolution and clustering of rich clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/222.2.323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.