The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of a complete galaxy redshift survey - II. The field-galaxy luminosity function
Open accessAbstract
We present a detailed analysis of the field-galaxy luminosity function for five magnitude-limited redshift surveys. We apply maximum-likelihood estimators which we demonstrate provide unbiased estimates of the luminosity function for spatially inhomogeneous distributions under the assumption that luminosity is uncorrelated with position. A likelihood-ratio test is devised which can be used to assess whether specific functional forms of the luminosity function provide acceptable fits to the observations. These methods, and asymptotic estimates of their errors, are checked against Monte Carlo simulations. Our results show that the luminosity functions from the AARS, KOS and KOSS redshift surveys are all compatible with Schechter functions. The luminosity function for the CfA survey does not fit a Schechter function. In particular, the bright end falls off less steeply than a Schechter function, but we argue that this is caused by the large random errors in the Zwicky magnitudes. From these field surveys there is no evidence for morphological type differences in the field luminosity function for types earlier than Sc. Later type galaxies (Sc-I) are significantly fainter than earlier types. With the exception of the CfA survey, the luminosity functions derived from the redshift surveys are compatible with each other. We conclude that the field luminosity function is well described by a Schechter function with parameters |$\alpha=-1.07\pm0.05,M{^\ast_B}_\text T=-19.68\pm0.10, \enspace\text{and}\enspace\phi^\ast=(1.56\pm0.34)\times10^{-2}\text {Mpc} ^{-3}\enspace \text{for}\enspace H_0=100 \text{km}\text s^{-1}\text {Mpc} ^{-2}$|.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Luminosity Function of Galaxies in SDSS Commissioning Data
Blanton, M. R., Dalcanton, J., Eisenstein, D., Loveday, J., Strauss, M. A., SubbaRao, M., Weinberg, D. H., Anderson, Jr., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2001) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/320405 · Cited by 659
Pérez‐González, P. G., Rieke, G. H., Villar, V., Barro, G., Blaylock, M., Egami, E., Gallego, J., Gil de Paz, A., Pascual, S., Zamorano, J., et al. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/523690 · Cited by 601
Rates of tidal disruption of stars by massive central black holes
Magorrian, J., & Tremaine, S. (1999) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02853.x · Cited by 424
Using transfer learning to detect galaxy mergers
Ackermann, S., Schawinski, K., Zhang, C., Weigel, A. K., & Turp, M. D. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1398 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Efstathiou, G., Ellis, R. S., & Peterson, B. A.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-05-01
- Volume
- 232
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 431-461
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1980454973
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of a complete galaxy redshift survey - II. The field-galaxy luminosity function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/232.2.431
- The paper
- Efstathiou, G., Ellis, R. S., & Peterson, B. A. (1988). Analysis of a complete galaxy redshift survey - II. The field-galaxy luminosity function. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/232.2.431
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.