The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extended rotation curves of spiral galaxies: dark haloes and modified dynamics
Open accessAbstract
Strict criteria are applied to the sample of spiral galaxies with measured rotation curves in order to select those objects for which the observed rotation curve is an accurate tracer of the radial force law. The resulting sub-sample of 10 galaxies is then considered in view of two suggested explanations for the discrepancy between the luminous mass and the conventional dynamical mass of galaxies: dark haloes and the modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND). This is done by means of least-squares fits to the rotation curves. Three-parameter dark-halo models (M/L for the visible disc, the core radius and the asymptotic circular velocity of the halo) work well in reproducing the observed rotation curves, and it is found that, for the higher luminosity galaxies, the visible matter dominates the mass distribution within the optically bright disc. However, in the low-luminosity gas-rich dwarfs the dark component is everywhere dominant. MOND, with one free parameter, (M/L for the visible disc) generally works well in predicting the form of the rotation curves, in some cases better than multi-parameter dark-halo fits. If the distance to the galaxy is also taken as a free parameter, then the MOND fits are as good as three parameter dark-halo models and, with one exception, the implied distances are consistent with the adopted distances within the probable uncertainty in the distance estimates. Restricting the number of parameter in dark-halo models by making use of the disc-halo coupling does not produce satisfactory fits to the rotation curves. The overall conclusion is that MOND is currently the best phenomenological description of the systematics of the discrepancy in galaxies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Relativistic gravitation theory for the modified Newtonian dynamics paradigm
Bekenstein, J. D. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.083509 · Cited by 1,487
The Structure of Dark Matter Halos in Dwarf Galaxies
Burkert, A. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309560 · Cited by 1,379
Bertone, G., & Hooper, D. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002 · Cited by 1,241
SPARC: MASS MODELS FOR 175 DISK GALAXIES WITH SPITZER PHOTOMETRY AND ACCURATE ROTATION CURVES
Lelli, F., McGaugh, S. S., & Schombert, J. M. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157 · Cited by 835
Metadata
- Authors
- Begeman, K. G., Broeils, A. H., & Sanders, R. H.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-04-01
- Volume
- 249
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 523-537
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2136688777
- Cited by
- 926
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extended rotation curves of spiral galaxies: dark haloes and modified dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/249.3.523
- The paper
- Begeman, K. G., Broeils, A. H., & Sanders, R. H. (1991). Extended rotation curves of spiral galaxies: dark haloes and modified dynamics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/249.3.523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.