The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opacities for stellar envelopes
Open accessAbstract
We define stellar envelopes to be those regions of stellar interiors in which atoms exist and are not markedly perturbed by the plasma environment. Availability of accurate and extensive atomic data is a prime requirement for the calculation of envelope opacities. For envelopes we adopt the criterion of mass density |$\rho \le 0.01\ {\rm g} \ {\rm cm}^{-3}$|. We present radiative Rosseland mean opacities for envelopes obtained using atomic data calculated in an international collaboration referred to as the Opacity Project, or OP. Equations of state are calculated using an occupation-probability formalism. To a good approximation, ionization equilibria and level populations in envelopes depend only on the temperature T and electron density |$N_{\rm e}$| and are insensitive to chemical mixtures. Monochromatic opacities for all abundant chemical elements are therefore calculated on a grid of (|$T,\ N_{\rm e}$|) values and are archived. Rosseland mean opacities are then readily calculated for any chemical mixture. Tables of Rosseland means, for any required mixtures and as functions of |$\rho$| and T, are available on request in computer-readable form. The present, op, results are compared with those from another recent study, referred to as opal, by C. A. Iglesias and F. A. Rogers at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The agreement between the op and opal calculations is generally good, although there are some differences. Both calculations give results larger than those obtained in earlier work, by factors of up to 3 or more.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Graßhoff, G. (1990) · Studies in the history of mathematics and physical sciences · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4468-4_7 · Cited by 127
Cited by
Ferguson, J. W., Alexander, D. R., Allard, F., Barman, T., Bodnarik, J. G., Hauschildt, P. H., Heffner‐Wong, A., & Tamanai, A. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/428642 · Cited by 1,327
Pauldrach, A. W. A., Hoffmann, T. L., & Lennon, M. (2001) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010805 · Cited by 517
A higher-than-predicted measurement of iron opacity at solar interior temperatures
Bailey, J. E., Nagayama, T., Loisel, G. P., Rochau, G. A., Blancard, C., Colgan, J., Cosse, P., Faussurier, G., Fontes, C. J., Gilleron, F., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14048 · Cited by 441
Self-citationHelioseismological Implications of Recent Solar Abundance Determinations
Bahcall, J. N., Basu, S., Pinsonneault, M., & Serenelli, A. M. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/426070 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Seaton, M. J., Yan, Y., Mihalas, D., & Pradhan, A. K.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-02-15
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 805-828
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2054408680
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opacities for stellar envelopes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/266.4.805
- The paper
- Seaton, M. J., Yan, Y., Mihalas, D., & Pradhan, A. K. (1994). Opacities for stellar envelopes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/266.4.805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.