Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation – II. Comparison with N-body simulations
Open accessAbstract
We have made a detailed comparison of the results of N-body simulations with the analytical description of the merging histories of dark matter haloes presented in Lacey & Cole, which is based on an extension of the Press-Schechter method. We find the analytical predictions for the halo mass function, merger rates and formation times to be remarkably accurate. The N-body simulations used 1283 particles and were of self- similar clustering, with |$\Omega = 1$| and initial power spectra |$P(k)\propto k^n$| with spectral indices n =−2, −1,0. The analytical model is, however, expected to apply for arbitrary Ω and more general power spectra. Dark matter haloes were identified in the simulations using two different methods and at a range of overdensities. For haloes selected at mean overdensities ∼100-200, the analytical mass function was found to provide a good fit to the simulations with a collapse threshold close to that predicted by the spherical collapse model, with a typical error of |$\lesssim 30$| per cent over a range of 103 in mass, which is the full dynamical range of our N-body simulation. This was insensitive to the type of filtering used. Over a range of 102- 103 in mass, there was also good agreement with the analytical predictions for merger rates including their dependence on the masses of the two haloes involved and the time interval being considered, and for formation times, including the dependence on halo mass and formation epoch. The analytical Press-Schechter mass function and its extension to halo lifetimes and merger rates thus provide a very useful description of the growth of dark matter haloes through hierarchical clustering, and should provide a valuable tool in studies of the formation and evolution of galaxies and galaxy clusters.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 703
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bond J. R., Myers S. T., 1993a, CITA preprint 93/27
- Bond J. R., Myers S. T., 1993b, CITA preprint 93/28
- Cole S., Aragón-Salamanca A., Frenk C. S., Navarro J. F., Zepf S., 1994, MNRAS, in press
- Press W. H., Schechter P., 1974, ApJ, 187, 425 (PS)
- Authors
- Lacey, C., & Cole, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Durham University (GB)
- ORCID
- Lacey, Cedric
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 676-692
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2083352943
- Cited by
- 703
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- hierarchical galaxy formation, halo mass function, halo formation time, halo identification, spherical collapse, power spectrum, cosmological constant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review