Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,588

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The soft gamma repeaters as very strongly magnetized neutron stars - I. Radiative mechanism for outbursts

Open access
Thompson, Christopher, Duncan, Robert C.·1995·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

A radiative model for the soft gamma repeaters and the energetic 1979 March 5 burst is presented. We identify the sources of these bursts with neutron stars the external magnetic fields of which are much stronger than those of ordinary pulsars. Several independent arguments point to a neutron star with Bdipole ~ 5 × 1014 G as the source of the March 5 event. A very strong field can (i) spin down the star to an 8-s period in the ~ 104-yr age of the surrounding supernova remnant N49; (ii) provide enough energy for the March 5 event; (iii) undergo a large-scale interchange instability the growth time of which is comparable to the ~ 0.2-s width of the initial hard transient phase of the March 5 event; (iv) confine the energy that was radiated in the soft tail of that burst; (v) reduce the Compton scattering cross-section sufficiently to generate a radiative flux that is ~ 104 times the (non-magnetic) Eddington flux; (vi) decay significantly in ~ 104–105 yr, as is required to explain the activity of soft gamma repeater sources on this time-scale; and (vii) power the quiescent X-ray emission LX ~ 7 × 1035 erg s–1 observed by Einstein and ROSAT as it diffuses the stellar interior. We propose that the 1979 March 5 event was triggered by a large-scale reconnection/interchange instability of the stellar magnetic field, and the soft repeat bursts by cracking of the crust. The hard initial spike of the March 5 event is identified with an expanding pair fireball, and the soft tail of that burst, together with the short, soft repeat bursts, with a pair plasma trapped in the stellar magnetosphere. We construct a detailed radiative model that describes the cooling of such a plasma. The opacity is dominated by the electron–baryon contaminant in a cold surface layer, and the plasma releases energy as the edge of the pair-dominated region propagates inward, in a cooling wave. The rate at which the plasma volume contracts is limited either by the rate of advection of heat toward the stellar surface (where the field is strongest and the scattering opacity weakest), or by ablation of ions and electrons from the stellar surface. The effective temperature of the surface radiation depends only on the surface magnetic field strength in the regime where the radiative flux is limited by ablation from the neutron star surface (which is the regime of interest in the March 5 event), and otherwise is weakly dependent on the plasma energy density. We argue that the deposition of equivalent energy in a much weaker magnetic field (characteristic of ordinary pulsars) necessarily generates a very high scattering depth which chokes off the radiative flow on the observed ~ 0.1-s time-scale of soft gamma repeater bursts. Indeed, we suggest that the same basic magnetospheric emission mechanism operates at lower field strengths (B ~ 1012 G) in Type II X-ray bursts, which have much lower luminosities than soft gamma repeater bursts. Important magnetic radiative effects include the suppression of Compton scattering in the extraordinary polarization mode, and stimulated photon splitting. We derive the Boltzmann equations for the photon occupation number which describe stimulated photon splitting, as well as photon merging. We show that the net splitting rate vanishes in thermal equilibrium. Radiative diffusion occurs primarily in the E-mode, although rapid scattering of the O-mode ensures convergence of the photon distribution function to a Bose–Einstein form. This allows us to write down diffusion equations for the photon energy flux and number flux as linear superpositions of gradients in the temperature and chemical potential. The transition from a Planck to a Bose–Einstein spectrum occurs at T ~ 10 keV. Photon splitting at higher temperatures can impede free-streaming of photons across the magnetic field lines, but splitting of high-energy photons is impeded by the inverse process of photon merging. We demonstrate that only a small fraction of the pair bubble energy can be conducted into the crust during the lifetime of the burst. We discuss the radiative ablation of matter from the heated stellar surface after the magnetospheric pair plasma is dissipated. The ensuing surface afterglow is typically ~ 1 per cent of the burst luminosity. Direct pair neutrino cooling of the plasma is shown to be unimportant for soft gamma repeater bursts, but may help to determine the light curve of the March 5 event. Finally, we make a critical comparison between this model and models in which the soft gamma repeater bursts are triggered by accretion and/or involve surface cooling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/275.2.255

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,588

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, C., & Duncan, R. C.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
1995-07
Volume
275
Issue
2
Pages
255-300
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2115517418
Cited by
1,588
References
0
FWCI
12.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The soft gamma repeaters as very strongly magnetized neutron stars - I. Radiative mechanism for outbursts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/275.2.255
The paper
Thompson, C., & Duncan, R. C. (1995). The soft gamma repeaters as very strongly magnetized neutron stars - I. Radiative mechanism for outbursts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/275.2.255

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.