The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modelling accretion in protobinary systems
Open accessAbstract
A method for following fragmentation simulations further in time using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) is presented. In a normal SPH simulation of the collapse and fragmentation of a molecular cloud, high-density regions of gas that form protostars are represented by many particles with small separations. These high-density regions require small time-steps, limiting the time for which the simulation can be followed. Thus, the end result of the fragmentation can never be definitively ascertained, and comparisons between cloud fragmentation calculations and the observed characteristics of stellar systems cannot be made. In this paper, each high-density region is replaced by a single, non-gaseous particle, with appropriate boundary conditions, which contains all the mass in the region and accretes any infalling mass. This enables the evolution of the cloud and the resulting protostars to be followed for many orbits or until most of the original cloud mass has been accreted. The Boss & Bodenheimer standard isothermal test case for the fragmentation of an interstellar cloud is used as an example for the technique. It is found that the binary protostellar system that forms initially does not merge, but instead forms a multiple system. The collapse is followed to four initial cloud free-fall times when approximately 80 per cent of the original mass of the cloud has been accreted by the protostars, or surrounds them in discs, and the remainder of the material has been expelled out to the radius of the initial cloud by the binary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smoothed particle hydrodynamics
Monaghan, J. J. (2005) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/8/r01 · Cited by 2,754
Moe, M., & Di Stefano, R. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6 · Cited by 1,207
Phantom: A Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics and Magnetohydrodynamics Code for Astrophysics
Price, D. J., Wurster, J., Tricco, T. S., Nixon, C., Toupin, S., Pettitt, A., Chan, C., Mentiplay, D., Laibe, G., Glover, S., et al. (2018) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2018.25 · Cited by 429
Chaotic star formation and the alignment of stellar rotation with disc and planetary orbital axes
Bate, M. R., Lodato, G., & Pringle, J. E. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15773.x · Cited by 344
Self-citationDale, J. E., Ercolano, B., & Bonnell, I. A. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21205.x · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., & Price, N. M.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-11-15
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 362-376
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1639285581
- Cited by
- 910
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling accretion in protobinary systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/277.2.362
- The paper
- Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., & Price, N. M. (1995). Modelling accretion in protobinary systems. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/277.2.362
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.