Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

High-order correlations of peaks and haloes: a step towards understanding galaxy biasing

Open access
Mo, H. J., Jing, Y. P., White, S. D. M.·1997·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We develop an analytic model for the hierarchical correlation amplitudes is the jth order connected moment of counts in spheres of radius R) of density peaks and dark matter haloes in the quasi-linear regime. The statistical distributions of density peaks and dark matter haloes within the initial density field (assumed Gaussian) are determined by the peak formalism of Bardeen et al. and by an extension of the Press-Schechter formalism, respectively. Modifications of these distributions caused by gravitationally induced motions are treated using a spherical collapse model. We test our model against results for S3,g(R) and S4,g(R) from a variety of N-body simulations. The model works well for peaks even on scales where the second moment of mass is significantly greater than unity. The model also works successfully for haloes that are identified earlier than the time when the moments are calculated. Because haloes are spatially exclusive at the time of their identification, our model is only qualitatively correct for haloes identified at the same time as the moments are calculated. For currently popular initial density spectra, the values of Sj,g at R ∼ 10 h−1 Mpc are significantly smaller for both haloes and peaks than those for the mass, unless the linear bias parameterb [defined by for large R] is comparable to or less than unity. The Sj,g depend only weakly on b for large b but increase rapidly with decreasing b at b ∼1. Thus if galaxies are associated with peaks in the initial density field, or with dark haloes formed at high redshifts, a measurement of Sj,g in the quasi-linear regime should determine whether galaxies are significantly biased relative to the mass. We use our model to interpret the observed high-order correlation functions of galaxies and clusters. We find that if the values of Sj,gfor galaxies are as high as those given by the APM survey, then APM galaxies should not be significantly biased.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/284.1.189

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 225

Metadata

Authors
Mo, H. J., Jing, Y. P., & White, S. D. M.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
1997-01-01
Volume
284
Issue
1
Pages
189-201
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2095338281
Cited by
225
References
0
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-order correlations of peaks and haloes: a step towards understanding galaxy biasing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/284.1.189
The paper
Mo, H. J., Jing, Y. P., & White, S. D. M. (1997). High-order correlations of peaks and haloes: a step towards understanding galaxy biasing. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/284.1.189

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.