Cited by 39Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstronomical Observations and InstrumentationAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

The PAU Survey: Photometric redshifts using transfer learning from simulations

Open access
Eriksen, M, Alarcon, A, Cabayol, L, Carretero, J, Casas, R, Castander, F J, De Vicente, J, Fernandez, E +10 more·2020·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the deepz deep learning photometric redshift (photo-z) code. As a test case, we apply the code to the PAU survey (PAUS) data in the COSMOS field. deepz reduces the σ68 scatter statistic by 50 per cent at iAB = 22.5 compared to existing algorithms. This improvement is achieved through various methods, including transfer learning from simulations where the training set consists of simulations as well as observations, which reduces the need for training data. The redshift probability distribution is estimated with a mixture density network (MDN), which produces accurate redshift distributions. Our code includes an autoencoder to reduce noise and extract features from the galaxy SEDs. It also benefits from combining multiple networks, which lowers the photo-z scatter by 10 per cent. Furthermore, training with randomly constructed coadded fluxes adds information about individual exposures, reducing the impact of photometric outliers. In addition to opening up the route for higher redshift precision with narrow bands, these machine learning techniques can also be valuable for broad-band surveys.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/staa2265

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using a pretraining on simulations was found to reduce the photo-z scatter by as much as 50% for faint galaxies.

    “Using a pretraining on simulations was found to reduce the photo-z scatter by as much as 50% for faint galaxies.”

    From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Eriksen et al. (2020)

  • Eriksen et al. (2020) explored transfer learning using a MDN trained on a combination of FSPS simulations and data from the PAU Survey.

    “This approach was for instance explored in Eriksen et al. (2020) using a MDN trained on a combination of FSPS simulations and data from the PAU Survey.”

    From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Eriksen et al. (2020)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eriksen, M., Alarcon, A., Cabayol, L., Carretero, J., Casas, R., Castander, F. J., De Vicente, J., Fernandez, E., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., Joachimi, B., Miquel, R., Padilla, C., Sanchez, E., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., & Tallada, P.
Affiliations
  • Institute for High Energy Physics (ES)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • Institute of Space Sciences (ES)
  • Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Avenida Complutense 40, E-28040 Madrid (Madrid), Spain
  • Instituto de Física Teórica (IFT-UAM/CSIC), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
  • Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
  • Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
  • Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Eriksen, M
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2020-08-06
Volume
497
Issue
4
Pages
4565-4579
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W3017324097
Cited by
39
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (CSD2007-00060, AYA2015-71825, ESP2017-89838, PGC2018-094773, SEV-2016-0588, SEV-2016-0597, MDM-2015-0509)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya
  • Durham University
  • European Research Council (StG DEGAS-259586)
  • ETH Zurich
  • H2020 European Research Council (StG ADULT-279396)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (639.043.512)
  • University College London (776247)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
photometric redshifts, transfer learning, Pau, COSMOS field, mixture density networks, autoencoder, galaxy spectral energy distributions, narrow-band survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review