Noise reduction for weak lensing mass mapping: an application of generative adversarial networks to Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data
Open accessAbstract
We propose a deep-learning approach based on generative adversarial networks (GANs) to reduce noise in weak lensing mass maps under realistic conditions. We apply image-to-image translation using conditional GANs to the mass map obtained from the first-year data of Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) Survey. We train the conditional GANs by using 25 000 mock HSC catalogues that directly incorporate a variety of observational effects. We study the non-Gaussian information in denoised maps using one-point probability distribution functions (PDFs) and also perform matching analysis for positive peaks and massive clusters. An ensemble learning technique with our GANs is successfully applied to reproduce the PDFs of the lensing convergence. About $60{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ of the peaks in the denoised maps with height greater than 5σ have counterparts of massive clusters within a separation of 6 arcmin. We show that PDFs in the denoised maps are not compromised by details of multiplicative biases and photometric redshift distributions, nor by shape measurement errors, and that the PDFs show stronger cosmological dependence compared to the noisy counterpart. We apply our denoising method to a part of the first-year HSC data to show that the observed mass distribution is statistically consistent with the prediction from the standard ΛCDM model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Shirasaki et al. (2021) found that about 60% of peaks identified on denoised maps have significant clusters counterparts, against about 85% of positive matches on true maps.
“On simulations the authors find that about 60% of the peaks identified on the denoised maps have significant clusters counterparts, against about 85% of positive matches on true maps”
From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Shirasaki et al. (2021)
The adversarial model in Shirasaki et al. is not a generative model; the denoiser does not take random variables as input and is therefore deterministic.
“It is to be noted here that this adversarial model is not a generative model, the denoiser does not take random variables as an input and is therefore deterministic.”
From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Shirasaki et al. (2021)
Shirasaki et al. (2021) showed that the 1-point statistics of the recovered map shows stronger cosmological dependence than the noisy maps.
“the authors further show that the 1-point statistics of the recovered map shows stronger cosmological dependence than the noisy maps”
From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Shirasaki et al. (2021)
Cites
Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesis
Brock, A., Donahue, J., & Simonyan, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.11096 · Cited by 3,717 · see citing works
Non-Gaussian information from weak lensing data via deep learning
Gupta, A., Matilla, J. M. Z., Hsu, D., & Haiman, Z. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103515 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Interpreting deep learning models for weak lensing
Matilla, J. M. Z., Sharma, M., Hsu, D., & Haiman, Z. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.123506 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Denoising weak lensing mass maps with deep learning
Shirasaki, M., Yoshida, N., & Ikeda, S. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.043527 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys
Huertas-Company, M., & Lanusse, F. (2023) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.55 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“Shirasaki et al. (2021) generated mock HSC observations including photometric redshift uncertainties, shape measurement uncertainties, realistic galaxy ellipticity noise and distribution on the sky, and actual HSC survey masks.”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Shirasaki, M., Moriwaki, K., Oogi, T., Yoshida, N., Ikeda, S., & Nishimichi, T.
- Affiliations
- The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Chiba University (JP)
- Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (JP)
- The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Shirasaki, Masato
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-04-09
- Volume
- 504
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1825-1839
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W3151390452
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- MEXT (18H04358, 19K14767)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJCR1414, JP20317829, JP17K14273, JP19H00677)
- National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- weak gravitational lensing, generative adversarial networks, conditional generative adversarial networks, image-to-image translation, cluster matching, multiplicative bias, Hyper Suprime-Cam, mock catalogues
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review