Cited by 11Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSpace Satellite Systems and Control

New ephemerides of outer planetary satellites

Open access
Emelyanov, N V, Varfolomeev, M I, Lainey, V·2022·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Ephemerides of planetary satellites require regular updates to take into account new observations of the satellites. Such revision has been all the more necessary in the case of outer planetary satellites, since a number of new moons have been discovered recently. Thus, we present updated versions of the ephemerides of the outer planetary satellites. The problem and the methodology for estimating ephemeris accuracy are discussed. Comparison with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) ephemerides proves that the accuracy depends largely on the distribution of the observations. We give examples where, for a few satellites, the O−C residuals increase sharply at time intervals lying significantly beyond the time interval of observations used to generate the ephemerides. This fact alone indicates that there is an urgent need for new observations. Besides the ephemerides of moons, which can be accessed online via the MULTI-SAT server, we provide orbital parameters for the recently discovered faint satellites of Jupiter and Saturn. The problems discussed in this work are important for planning space observations of the outer satellites by future space missions like the European Space Agency (ESA) JUpiter ICy moons Explorer (JUICE) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Europa Clipper missions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stac586

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 11

Authors
Emelyanov, N. V., Varfolomeev, M. I., & Lainey, V
Affiliations
  • M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University/Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Universitetskij prospect 13, Moscow 119992, Russia
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2022-03-24
Volume
512
Issue
2
Pages
2044-2050
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W4214808025
Cited by
11
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • CNES
  • ESA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
ephemeris, ephemeris accuracy, O-C residuals, new moon, Jupiter's satellites, Saturnian satellites, orbital elements, Europa Clipper, space mission planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review