Simulations of galaxy cluster mergers with velocity-dependent, rare, and frequent self-interactions
Open accessAbstract
Self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) has been proposed to solve small-scale problems in $\rm {\Lambda CDM}$ cosmology. In previous work, constraints on the self-interaction cross-section of dark matter have been derived assuming that the self-interaction cross-section is independent of velocity. However, a velocity-dependent cross-section is more natural in most theories of SIDM. Using idealized N-body simulations without baryons, we study merging clusters with velocity-dependent SIDM. In addition to the usual rare scattering in the isotropic limit, we also simulate these systems with anisotropic, small-angle (frequent) scatterings. We find that the collisionless brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) has an offset from the DM peak that grows at later stages. Finally, we also extend the existing upper bounds on the velocity-independent, isotropic self-interaction cross-section to the parameter space of rare and frequent velocity-dependent self-interactions by studying the central densities of dark matter-only isolated haloes. For these upper-bound parameters, the DM-BCG offsets just after the first pericentre in the dark matter-only simulations are found to be ≲10 kpc. On the other hand, because of BCG oscillations, we speculate that the distribution of BCG offsets in a relaxed cluster is a statistically viable probe. Therefore, this motivates further studies of BCG off-centring in hydrodynamic cosmological simulations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Sabarish, V. M., Brüggen, M., Schmidt-Hoberg, K., Fischer, M. S., & Kahlhoefer, F.
- Affiliations
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY (DE)
- Excellence Cluster Origins (DE)
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Sabarish, V M
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024-03-09
- Volume
- 529
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2032-2046
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W4392630427
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Desy Publications Database (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- DESY Publication Database (PUBDB) (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KA 4662/1-2)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- self-interacting dark matter, velocity-dependent cross section, cluster mergers, central density, small-scale structure problem, N-body simulations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review