The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Convolution Lagrangian perturbation theory for biased tracers
Open accessAbstract
We present a new formulation of Lagrangian perturbation theory which allows accurate predictions of the real- and redshift-space correlation functions of the mass field and dark matter haloes. Our formulation involves a non-perturbative resummation of Lagrangian perturbation theory and indeed can be viewed as a partial resummation of the formalism of Matsubara in which we keep exponentiated all of the terms which tend to a constant at large separation. One of the key features of our method is that we naturally recover the Zel'dovich approximation as the lowest order of our expansion for the matter correlation function. We compare our results against a suite of N-body simulations and obtain good agreement for the correlation functions in real space and for the monopole correlation function in redshift space. The agreement becomes worse for higher multipole moments of the redshift-space, halo correlation function. Our formalism naturally includes non-linear bias and explains the strong bias-dependence of the multipole moments of the redshift-space correlation function seen in N-body simulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
Cited by
Alam, S., Ata, M., Bailey, S., Beutler, F., Bizyaev, D., Blazek, J. A., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Burden, A., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721 · Cited by 3,056
Self-citationDesjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
d'Amico, G., Gleyzes, J., Kokron, N., Markovic, K., Senatore, L., Zhang, P., Beutler, F., & Gil-Marín, H. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/005 · Cited by 448
Gil-Marín, H., Bautista, J. E., Paviot, R., Vargas-Magaña, M., de la Torre, S., Fromenteau, S., Alam, S., Ávila, S., Burtin, E., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2455 · Cited by 292
Howlett, C., Ross, A. J., Samushia, L., Percival, W. J., & Manera, M. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2693 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlson, J., Reid, B., & White, M.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-12-20
- Volume
- 429
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1674-1685
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2047434649
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Convolution Lagrangian perturbation theory for biased tracers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/sts457
- The paper
- Carlson, J., Reid, B., & White, M. (2013). Convolution Lagrangian perturbation theory for biased tracers. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts457
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.