Cited by 207Dark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation Theories

Colliding clusters and dark matter self-interactions

Open access
Kahlhoefer, Felix, Schmidt-Hoberg, Kai, Frandsen, Mads T., Sarkar, Subir·2014·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

When a dark matter halo moves through a background of dark matter particles, self-interactions can lead to both deceleration and evaporation of the halo and thus shift its centroid relative to the collisionless stars and galaxies. We study the magnitude and time evolution of this shift for two classes of dark matter self-interactions, namely frequent self-interactions with small momentum transfer (e.g. due to long-range interactions) and rare self-interactions with large momentum transfer (e.g. contact interactions), and find important differences between the two cases. We find that neither effect can be strong enough to completely separate the dark matter halo from the galaxies, if we impose conservative bounds on the self-interaction cross-section. The majority of both populations remain bound to the same gravitational potential, and the peaks of their distributions are therefore always coincident. Consequently, any apparent separation is mainly due to particles which are leaving the gravitational potential, so will be largest shortly after the collision but not observable in evolved systems. Nevertheless, the fraction of collisions with large momentum transfer is an important characteristic of self-interactions, which can potentially be extracted from observational data and provide an important clue as to the nature of dark matter.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stt2097

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SIDM simulations show a low-density bridge forming between the two peaks after first pericenter in a bimodal merger, which shifts the centroid but not the peak, which stays with the galaxies.

    “In fact, SIDM simulations (Kahlhoefer et al. 2014;Kim et al. 2016;Robertson et al. 2017) show a low-density bridge forming between the two peaks after first pericenter in a bimodal merger.This shifts the centroid but not the peak, which stays with the galaxies.”

    From The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters (2018) · cites this paper as Kahlhoefer et al. (2014)

    Section 4 (p. 10) reports that differing tails separate the dark-matter and galaxy centroids while their peaks remain coincident; Section 5 (p. 12) reiterates this result. The paper does not describe a low-density bridge between the two cluster peaks, so that specific feature is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies have focused on mass-galaxy offsets, which numerical simulations have shown to be intrinsically small because galaxies remain tightly coupled to the dominant dark matter potential even with significant self-interaction.

    “However, previous studies have focused on mass-galaxy offsets, which numerical simulations have shown to be intrinsically small because galaxies remain tightly coupled to the dominant dark matter potential even with significant self-interaction.”
  • Even in the presence of a nonzero cross section, the expected mass-galaxy offset is frequently too small to be detected with current observational precision.

    “Furthermore, numerical simulations have shown that even in the presence of a nonzero cross section, the expected massgalaxy offset is frequently too small to be detected with current observational precision (F.Kahlhoefer et al. 2014).”
  • Cluster mergers can also be used to test SIDM effects that cannot be modeled with a drag force; as noted by Kahlhoefer et al. (2014), the drag-force model maps well to frequent interactions with low momentum transfer, as in a long-range force.

    “Cluster mergers can also be used to test SIDM effects that cannot be modeled with a drag force; as noted by Kahlhoefer et al. (2014), the drag-force model maps well to frequent interactions with low momentum transfer, as in a long-range force.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Binney J., Tremaine S., 2008, Galactic Dynamics, 2 edn. Princeton University Press
  2. Dawson W. A., 2013 Evidence for self-interacting dark matter. Presented at the KITP Conference Identifying and Characterizing Dark Matter via Multiple Probes
  3. Foot R., 2004, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 13, 2161
  4. Harvey D., 2013 Measuring the cross-section of dm in clusters. Presented at the conference Ripples in the Cosmos at Durham University
  5. Harvey D., Massey R., Kitching T., Taylor A., Jullo E., et al., 2013, preprint (arXiv:1305.2117) · arXiv
  6. Peter A. H., Rocha M., Bullock J. S., Kaplinghat M., 2012, preprint (arXiv:1208.3026) · arXiv
  7. Tulin S., Yu H.-B., Zurek K. M., 2013, preprint (arXiv:1302.3898) · arXiv
  8. Watson W., Iliev I., Diego J., Gottlber S., Knebe A., et al., 2013, preprint (arXiv:1305.1976) · arXiv
  9. Zavala J., Vogelsberger M., Walker M. G., 2012, preprint (arXiv:1211.6426) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kahlhoefer, F., Schmidt-Hoberg, K., Frandsen, M. T., & Sarkar, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2013-11-26
Volume
437
Issue
3
Pages
2865-2881
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2013744410
Cited by
207
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Desy Publications Database (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • DESY Publication Database (PUBDB) (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (PHY11- 25915, 25915)
  • European Commission (237920)
  • National Research Foundation (120829)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (25915)
  • Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
  • Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond (11-120829)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/J000507/1, ST/L000474/1)
  • Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara (PHY-11-25915)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
dark matter self-interaction, dark matter halos, long-range interactions, contact interaction, momentum transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review