Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Numerical simulations of super-critical black hole accretion flows in general relativity

Open access
Sądowski, Aleksander, Narayan, Ramesh, McKinney, Jonathan C., Tchekhovskoy, Alexander·2014·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

A new general relativistic radiation magnetohydrodynamical code koral is described, which employs the M1 scheme to close the radiation moment equations. The code has been successfully verified against a number of tests. Axisymmetric simulations of super-critical magnetized accretion on non-rotating (a* = 0.0) and spinning (a* = 0.9) black holes are presented. The accretion rates in the two models are |$\dot{M}\approx 100{\rm -}200 \dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$|⁠. These first general relativistic simulations of super-critical black hole accretion are potentially relevant to tidal disruption events and hyper-accreting supermassive black holes in the early Universe. Both simulated models are optically and geometrically thick, and have funnels through which energy escapes in the form of relativistic gas, Poynting flux and radiative flux. The jet is significantly more powerful in the a* = 0.9 run. The net energy outflow rate in the two runs correspond to efficiencies of 5 per cent (a* = 0) and 33 per cent (a* = 0.9), as measured with respect to the mass accretion rate at the black hole. These efficiencies agree well with those measured in previous simulations of non-radiative geometrically thick discs. Furthermore, in the a* = 0.9 run, the outflow power appears to originate in the spinning black hole, suggesting that the associated physics is again similar in non-radiative and super-critical accretion flows. While the two simulations are efficient in terms of total energy outflow, both runs are radiatively inefficient. Their luminosities are only ∼1–10LEdd, which corresponds to a radiative efficiency ∼0.1 per cent. Interestingly, most of the radiative luminosity emerges through the funnels where the local radiative flux is highly super-Eddington.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stt2479

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Sądowski, A., Narayan, R., McKinney, J. C., & Tchekhovskoy, A.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2014-01-30
Volume
439
Issue
1
Pages
503-520
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1984055282
Cited by
335
References
58
FWCI
15.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerical simulations of super-critical black hole accretion flows in general relativity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stt2479
The paper
Sądowski, A., Narayan, R., McKinney, J. C., & Tchekhovskoy, A. (2014). Numerical simulations of super-critical black hole accretion flows in general relativity. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2479

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.