The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulating cosmic reionization: how large a volume is large enough?
Open accessAbstract
We present the largest-volume (425 Mpc h−1 = 607 Mpc on a side) full radiative transfer simulation of cosmic reionization to date. We show that there is significant additional power in density fluctuations at very large scales. We systematically investigate the effects this additional power has on the progress, duration and features of reionization and on selected reionization observables. We find that comoving volume of ∼100 Mpc h−1 per side is sufficient for deriving a convergent mean reionization history, but that the reionization patchiness is significantly underestimated. We use jackknife splitting to quantify the convergence of reionization properties with simulation volume. We find that sub-volumes of ∼100 Mpc h−1 per side or larger yield convergent reionization histories, except for the earliest times, but smaller volumes of ∼50 Mpc h−1 or less are not well converged at any redshift. Reionization history milestones show significant scatter between the sub-volumes, as high as Δz ∼ 1 for ∼50 Mpc h−1 volumes. If we only consider mean-density sub-regions the scatter decreases, but remains at Δz ∼ 0.1–0.2 for the different size sub-volumes. Consequently, many potential reionization observables like 21-cm rms, 21-cm PDF skewness and kurtosis all show good convergence for volumes of ∼200 Mpc h−1, but retain considerable scatter for smaller volumes. In contrast, the three-dimensional 21-cm power spectra at large scales (k < 0.25 h Mpc−1) do not fully converge for any sub-volume size. These additional large-scale fluctuations significantly enhance the 21-cm fluctuations, which should improve the prospects of detection considerably, given the lower foregrounds and greater interferometer sensitivity at higher frequencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Cited by
Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects
Dayal, P., & Ferrara, A. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Iliev, I. T., Mellema, G., Ahn, K., Shapiro, P. R., Mao, Y., & Pen, U.-L.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-01-23
- Volume
- 439
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 725-743
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2093073139
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulating cosmic reionization: how large a volume is large enough? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stt2497
- The paper
- Iliev, I. T., Mellema, G., Ahn, K., Shapiro, P. R., Mao, Y., & Pen, U.-L. (2014). Simulating cosmic reionization: how large a volume is large enough? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.