The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Swift monitoring of NGC 5548: X-ray reprocessing and short-term UV/optical variability
Open accessAbstract
Lags measured from correlated X-ray/UV/optical monitoring of AGN allow us to determine whether UV/optical variability is driven by reprocessing of X-rays or X-ray variability is driven by UV/optical seed photon variations. We present the results of the largest study to date of the relationship between the X-ray, UV and optical variability in an AGN with 554 observations, over a 750 d period, of the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 5548 with Swift. There is a good overall correlation between the X-ray and UV/optical bands, particularly on short time-scales (tens of days). The UV/optical bands lag the X-ray band with lags which are proportional to wavelength raised to the power 1.23 ± 0.31. This power is very close to the power (4/3) expected if short time-scale UV/optical variability is driven by reprocessing of X-rays by a surrounding accretion disc. The observed lags, however, are longer than expected from a standard Shakura–Sunyaev accretion disc with X-ray heating, given the currently accepted black hole mass and accretion rate values, but can be explained with a slightly larger mass and accretion rate, and a generally hotter disc. Some long-term UV/optical variations are not paralleled exactly in the X-rays, suggesting an additional component to the UV/optical variability arising perhaps from accretion rate perturbations propagating inwards through the disc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Active galactic nuclei: what’s in a name?
Padovani, P., Alexander, D. M., Assef, R. J., De Marco, B., Giommi, P., Hickox, R. C., Richards, G. T., Smolčić, V., Hatziminaoglou, E., Mainieri, V., et al. (2017) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9 · Cited by 666
Fausnaugh, M. M., Denney, K. D., Barth, A. J., Bentz, M. C., Bottorff, M. C., Carini, M. T., Croxall, K. V., Rosa, G. D., Goad, M. R., Horne, K., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/1/56 · Cited by 311
Self-citationEdelson, R., Gelbord, J. M., Horne, K., McHardy, I. M., Peterson, B. M., Arévalo, P., Breeveld, A. A., Rosa, G. D., Evans, P. A., Goad, M. R., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/129 · Cited by 302
Self-citationGrier, C. J., Trump, J. R., Shen, Y., Horne, K., Kinemuchi, K., McGreer, I. D., Starkey, D. A., Brandt, W. N., Hall, P. B., Kochanek, C. S., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa98dc · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- McHardy, I. M., Cameron, D. T., Dwelly, T., Connolly, S., Lira, P., Emmanoulopoulos, D., Gelbord, J., Breedt, E., Arevalo, P., & Uttley, P.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-08-29
- Volume
- 444
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1469-1474
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2159106386
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Swift monitoring of NGC 5548: X-ray reprocessing and short-term UV/optical variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stu1636
- The paper
- McHardy, I. M., Cameron, D. T., Dwelly, T., Connolly, S., Lira, P., Emmanoulopoulos, D., Gelbord, J., Breedt, E., Arevalo, P., & Uttley, P. (2014). Swift monitoring of NGC 5548: X-ray reprocessing and short-term UV/optical variability. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1636
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.