Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time correlation between the radio and gamma-ray activity in blazars and the production site of the gamma-ray emission

Open access
Max-Moerbeck, W., Hovatta, T., Richards, J. L., King, O. G., Pearson, T. J., Readhead, A. C. S., Reeves, R., Shepherd, M. C., Stevenson, M. A., Angelakis, E., Fuhrmann, L., Grainge, K. J. B., Pavlidou, V., Romani, R. W., Zensus, J. A.·2014·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

In order to determine the location of the gamma-ray emission site in blazars, we investigate the time-domain relationship between their radio and gamma-ray emission. Light curves for the brightest detected blazars from the first 3 yr of the mission of the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope are cross-correlated with 4 yr of 15 GHz observations from the Owens Valley Radio Observatory 40 m monitoring programme. The large sample and long light-curve duration enable us to carry out a statistically robust analysis of the significance of the cross-correlations, which is investigated using Monte Carlo simulations including the uneven sampling and noise properties of the light curves. Modelling the light curves as red noise processes with power-law power spectral densities, we find that only one of 41 sources with high-quality data in both bands shows correlations with significance larger than 3σ (AO 0235+164), with only two more larger than even 2.25σ (PKS 1502+106 and B2 2308+34). Additionally, we find correlated variability in Mrk 421 when including a strong flare that occurred in 2012 July–September. These results demonstrate very clearly the difficulty of measuring statistically robust multiwavelength correlations and the care needed when comparing light curves even when many years of data are used. This should be a caution. In all four sources, the radio variations lag the gamma-ray variations, suggesting that the gamma-ray emission originates upstream of the radio emission. Continuous simultaneous monitoring over a longer time period is required to obtain high significance levels in cross-correlations between gamma-ray and radio variability in most blazars.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stu1749

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Max-Moerbeck, W., Hovatta, T., Richards, J. L., King, O. G., Pearson, T. J., Readhead, A. C. S., Reeves, R., Shepherd, M. C., Stevenson, M. A., Angelakis, E., Fuhrmann, L., Grainge, K. J. B., Pavlidou, V., Romani, R. W., & Zensus, J. A.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2014-09-29
Volume
445
Issue
1
Pages
428-436
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2104216383
Cited by
158
References
1
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time correlation between the radio and gamma-ray activity in blazars and the production site of the gamma-ray emission. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stu1749
The paper
Max-Moerbeck, W., Hovatta, T., Richards, J. L., King, O. G., Pearson, T. J., Readhead, A. C. S., Reeves, R., Shepherd, M. C., Stevenson, M. A., Angelakis, E., Fuhrmann, L., Grainge, K. J. B., Pavlidou, V., Romani, R. W., & Zensus, J. A. (2014). Time correlation between the radio and gamma-ray activity in blazars and the production site of the gamma-ray emission. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1749

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.