On the age of the β Pictoris moving group
Open accessAbstract
Binks & Jeffries and Malo et al. have recently reported Li depletion boundary (LDB) ages for the β Pictoris moving group (BPMG) which are twice as old as the oft-cited kinematic age of ∼12 Myr.In this study, we present (1) a new evaluation of the internal kinematics of the BPMG using the revised Hipparcos astrometry and best available published radial velocities, and assess whether a useful kinematic age can be derived, and (2) derive an isochronal age based on the placement of the A-, F-, and G-type stars in the colour-magnitude diagram (CMD).We explore the kinematics of the BPMG looking at velocity trends along Galactic axes, and conducting traceback analyses assuming linear trajectories, epicyclic orbit approximation, and orbit integration using a realistic gravitational potential.None of the methodologies yield a kinematic age with small uncertainties using modern velocity data.Expansion in the Galactic X and Y directions is significant only at the 1.7σ and 2.7σ levels, and together yields an overall kinematic age with a wide range ( 13-58 Myr; 95 per cent CL).The A-type members are all on the zero-age main sequence, suggestive of an age of >20 Myr, and the loci of the CMD positions for the late-F-and G-type pre-main-sequence BPMG members have a median isochronal age of 22 Myr (± 3 Myr statistical, ±1 Myr systematic) when considering four sets of modern theoretical isochrones.The results from recent LDB and isochronal age analyses are now in agreement with a median BPMG age of 23 ± 3 Myr (overall 1σ uncertainty, including ±2 Myr statistical and ±2 Myr systematic uncertainties).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
β Pictoris b's age of 22 Myr is similar to the J1407 system, implying that a low-mass companion could have a fast rotation period, leading to a larger oblateness and J2 contribution that could hold ring structures in the equatorial plane out to larger radii.
“Its age of 22 Myr (Mamajek & Bell 2014) is similar to the J1407 system, implying that a low-mass companion could have a fast rotation period, leading to a larger oblateness and corresponding J 2 contribution, that could hold ring structures in the equatorial plane out to larger radii.”
From MODELING GIANT EXTRASOLAR RING SYSTEMS IN ECLIPSE AND THE CASE OF J1407B: SCULPTING BY EXOMOONS? (2015) · cites this paper as Mamajek & Bell 2014
Cites
Pecaut, M. J., Mamajek, E. E., & Bubar, E. J. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/746/2/154 · Cited by 564 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The mean LCC and UCL ages estimated by Mamajek et al. (2002) and Pecaut et al. (2012) are consistent with the Li depletion pattern observed by Song et al. (2012) if indeed BPMG is ∼ 23 Myr and TWA is ∼ 8 − 10 Myr (Weinberger et al. 2013; Ducourant et al. 2014).”
MethodSelf-citationPost–T Tauri Stars in the Nearest OB Association
Mamajek, E. E., Meyer, M. R., & Liebert, J. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/341952 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MODELING GIANT EXTRASOLAR RING SYSTEMS IN ECLIPSE AND THE CASE OF J1407B: SCULPTING BY EXOMOONS?
Kenworthy, M. A., & Mamajek, E. E. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/800/2/126 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
“The complex light curve of J1407 was first discussed in Mamajek et al. (2012), where intensity fluctuations of up to 95% were seen over a 56 day period in April and May 2007 towards this young (∼ 16 Myr) K5 premain sequence star in photometry taken as part of the SuperWASP Survey (Pollacco et al. 2006; Butters et al.…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationA search for transiting planets in the <i>β</i> Pictoris system
Mol Lous, M., Weenk, E., Kenworthy, M. A., Zwintz, K., & Kuschnig, R. (2018) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731941 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mamajek, E. E., & Bell, C. P. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mamajek, Eric E.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-10-16
- Volume
- 445
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2169-2180
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2170487617
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 18.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1313029)
- University of Rochester
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Keywords
- Beta Pictoris moving group, kinematic age, isochronal ages, lithium depletion boundary, Hipparcos astrometry, radial velocity, orbit integration, pre-main-sequence stars, color-magnitude diagram, A-type stars, F-type stars, G-type stars
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review