On the cross-section of dark matter using substructure infall into galaxy clusters
Open accessAbstract
We develop a statistical method to measure the interaction cross-section of dark matter, exploiting the continuous minor merger events in which small substructures fall into galaxy clusters. We find that by taking the ratio of the distances between the galaxies and dark matter, and galaxies and gas in accreting subhaloes, we form a quantity that can be statistically averaged over a large sample of systems whilst removing any inherent line-of-sight projections. To interpret this ratio as a cross-section of dark matter, we derive an analytical description of subhalo infall allowing us to constrain self-interaction models in which drag is an appropriate macroscopic treatment. We create mock observations from cosmological simulations of structure formation and find that collisionless dark matter becomes physically separated from X-ray gas by up to ∼20 h−1 kpc. Adding realistic levels of noise, we are able to predict achievable constraints from observational data. Current archival data should be able to detect a difference in the dynamical behaviour of dark matter and standard model particles at 6σ, and measure the total interaction cross-section σ/m with 68 per cent confidence limits of ±1 cm2 g−1. We note that this method is not restricted by the limited number of major merging events and is easily extended to large samples of clusters from future surveys which could potentially push statistical errors to <0.1 cm2 g−1.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The equation used by H15 to relate β to m_DM_s was developed assuming only small (≤30 kpc) displacements between DM, galaxies, and gas; Harvey et al. (2014) show how the analogy between galaxy and gas restoring forces (and hence the inferred drag force) breaks down quickly beyond 30 kpc displacements.
“The equation used by H15 to relate β to m DM s was developed assuming only small (30 kpc) displacements between DM, galaxies, and gas; Harvey et al. (2014) clearly show how the analogy between galaxy and gas restoring forces (and hence the inferred drag force) breaks down quickly beyond 30 kpc displacements.”
From The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters (2018) · cites this paper as Harvey et al. (2014)
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Frisch U., 1995, Turbulence. The legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
- Fruscione A. et al., 2006, in Silva D. R., Doxsey R. E., eds, Proc. SPIE Conf. Ser. Vol. 6270, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems. SPIE, Bellingham, p. 62701V
- Laureijs R. et al., 2011, preprint (arXiv:1110.3193) · arXiv
- Peter A. H. G., 2012, preprint (arXiv:1201.3942) · arXiv
- Planck Collaboration et al., 2013, preprint (arXiv:1303.5076) · arXiv
- Spergel D. et al., 2013, preprint (arXiv:1305.5422) · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters
Wittman, D., Golovich, N., & Dawson, W. A. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaee77 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harvey, D., Tittley, E., Massey, R., Kitching, T. D., Taylor, A., Pike, S. R., Kay, S. T., Lau, E. T., & Nagai, D.
- Affiliations
- Royal Observatory (GB)
- Durham University (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Harvey, David
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-04-25
- Volume
- 441
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 404-416
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2010220525
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1066293)
- Aspen Center for Physics (1066293, PHYS-1066293)
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/I00162X/1, ST/F002300/1, ST/K000977/1, PHYS-1066293, ST/F002289/1, ST/L000768/1, ST/I001573/1, ST/L00075X/1, ST/I001166/1, ST/H008519/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- dark matter self-interaction, interaction cross sections, galaxy clusters, minor mergers, X-ray gas, collisionless dark matter, line-of-sight projection, mock observations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review