Cited by 94Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The 55 Cancri planetary system: fully self-consistent N-body constraints and a dynamical analysis

Open access

Abstract

We present an updated study of the planets known to orbit 55 Cancri A using 1 418 high-precision radial velocity observations from four observatories (Lick, Keck, Hobby-Eberly Telescope, Harlan J. Smith Telescope) and transit time/durations for the inner-most planet, 55 Cancri ‘e’ (Winn et al. 2011). We provide the first posterior sample for the masses and orbital parameters based on self-consistent N-body orbital solutions for the 55 Cancri planets, all of which are dynamically stable (for at least 108 yr). We apply a GPU version of Radial velocity Using N-body Differential evolution Markov Chain Monte Carlo (run dmc; Nelson, Ford & Payne) to perform a Bayesian analysis of the radial velocity and transit observations. Each of the planets in this remarkable system has unique characteristics. Our investigation of high-cadence radial velocities and priors based on space-based photometry yields an updated mass estimate for planet ‘e’ (8.09 ± 0.26 M⊕), which affects its density (⁠|$5.51\pm ^{1.32}_{1.00}$| g cm−3) and inferred bulk composition. Dynamical stability dictates that the orbital plane of planet ‘e’ must be aligned to within 60° of the orbital plane of the outer planets (which we assume to be coplanar). The mutual interactions between the planets ‘b’ and ‘c’ may develop an apsidal lock about 180°. We find 36–45 per cent of all our model systems librate about the anti-aligned configuration with an amplitude of |$51^\circ \pm ^{6^\circ }_{10^\circ }$|⁠. Other cases showed short-term perturbations in the libration of ϖb − ϖc, circulation, and nodding, but we find the planets are not in a 3:1 mean-motion resonance. A revised orbital period and eccentricity for planet ‘d’ pushes it further towards the closest known Jupiter analogue in the exoplanet population.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stu450

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are nine super-Earths with good determinations of both their radius and mass: GJ 1214 b, 55 Cnc e, Kepler-36b, HD 97658 b, CoRoT-7b, HIP 116454 b, Kepler-78b, and Kepler-10b and 10c.

    “There are nine super-Earths with good determinations of both their radius and mass: GJ 1214 b (Charbonneau et al., 2009), 55 Cnc e (Gillon et al., 2012; Nelson et al., 2014), Kepler-36b (Carter et al., 2012), HD 97658 b (Dragomir et al., 2013), CoRoT-7b (Barros et al., 2014; Haywood et al., 2014), HIP 116454 b (Vanderburg et al., 2015), Kepler-78b (Howard et al., 2013; Pepe et al., 2013), and Ke”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Nelson et al., 2014

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Baluev, 2013, Astron. Comput., 3, 50, 10.1016/j.ascom.2013.11.003 · DOI
  2. Barnes, 2007, ApJ, 665, L67, 10.1086/521144 · DOI
  3. Bolmont, 2013, A&A, 556, A17, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220837 · DOI
  4. Butler, 1996, PASP, 108, 500, 10.1086/133755 · DOI
  5. Butler, 1997, ApJ, 474, L115, 10.1086/310444 · DOI
  6. Dawson, 2010, ApJ, 722, 937, 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/937 · DOI
  7. Demarque, 2004, ApJS, 155, 667, 10.1086/424966 · DOI
  8. Demory, 2011, A&A, 533, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117178 · DOI
  9. Demory, 2012, ApJ, 751, L28, 10.1088/2041-8205/751/2/L28 · DOI
  10. Dindar, 2013, New Astron., 23, 6, 10.1016/j.newast.2013.01.002 · DOI
  11. Dragomir, 2013, MOST Science Team
  12. Ehrenreich, 2012, A&A, 547, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219981 · DOI
  13. Endl, 2012, ApJ, 759, 19, 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/19 · DOI
  14. Fischer, 2008, ApJ, 675, 790, 10.1086/525512 · DOI
  15. Fischer, 2014, ApJS, 210, 5, 10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/5 · DOI
  16. Ford, 2006, ApJ, 642, 505, 10.1086/500802 · DOI
  17. Ford, 2007, ApJ, 664, L51, 10.1086/520579 · DOI
  18. Gillon, 2012, A&A, 539, A28, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118309 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ji, 2003, ApJ, 585, L139, 10.1086/374391 · DOI
  20. Kaib, 2011, ApJ, 742, L24, 10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/L24 · DOI
  21. Ketchum, 2013, ApJ, 762, 71, 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/71 · DOI
  22. Kley, 2004, A&A, 414, 735, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031589 · DOI
  23. Kokubo, 1998, MNRAS, 297, 1067, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01581.x · DOI
  24. McArthur, 2004, ApJ, 614, L81, 10.1086/425561 · DOI
  25. McGrath, 2003, ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 294, Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets, 145
  26. Madhusudhan, 2012, ApJ, 759, L40, 10.1088/2041-8205/759/2/L40 · DOI
  27. Marcy, 1992, PASP, 104, 270, 10.1086/132989 · DOI
  28. Marcy, 2002, ApJ, 581, 1375, 10.1086/344298 · DOI
  29. Mugrauer, 2006, Astron. Nachr., 327, 321, 10.1002/asna.200510528 · DOI
  30. Nelson, 2014, ApJS, 210, 11, 10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/11 · DOI
  31. Raymond, 2008, ApJ, 689, 478, 10.1086/592772 · DOI
  32. Rivera, 2010, ApJ, 719, 890, 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/890 · DOI
  33. Tan, 2013, ApJ, 777, 101, 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/101 · DOI
  34. ter Braak, 2006, Stat. Comput., 16, 239, 10.1007/s11222-006-8769-1 · DOI
  35. Teske, 2013, ApJ, 778, 132, 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/132 · DOI
  36. Valenti, 1995, PASP, 107, 966, 10.1086/133645 · DOI
  37. Van Laerhoven, 2012, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 113, 215, 10.1007/s10569-012-9410-6 · DOI
  38. Veras, 2011, ApJ, 727, 74, 10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/74 · DOI
  39. Vogt, 1994, Proc. SPIE Conf. Ser., Vol. 2198, Instrumentation in Astronomy VIII, 362
  40. von Braun, 2011, ApJ, 740, 49, 10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/49 · DOI
  41. Winn, 2011, ApJ, 737, L18, 10.1088/2041-8205/737/1/L18 · DOI
  42. Zhou, 2004, MNRAS, 350, 1495, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07755.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The Astrobiology Primer v2.0

    Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Adamala, K., Arina de la Rubia, L., Bond, J., Dartnell, L. R., Goldman, A. D., Lynch, K., et al. (2016) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1460 · Cited by 136

    “, 2009), 55 Cnc e (Gillon et al., 2012; Nelson et al., 2014), Kepler-36b (Carter et al.”

Metadata

Authors
Nelson, B. E., Ford, E. B., Wright, J. T., Fischer, D. A., von Braun, K., Howard, A. W., Payne, M. J., & Dindar, S.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Benjamin E.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2014-04-25
Volume
441
Issue
1
Pages
442-451
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2065486185
Cited by
94
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7
FWCI
6.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX09AM41G, NNX09AB35G)
  • Pennsylvania Space Grant Consortium
  • University of Florida
  • Pennsylvania State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
exoplanet masses, orbital elements, dynamic stability, mean motion resonance, libration, planet density, bulk composition, radial velocity, transit timing, 55 Cancri e

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review