The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 55 Cancri planetary system: fully self-consistent N-body constraints and a dynamical analysis
Open accessAbstract
We present an updated study of the planets known to orbit 55 Cancri A using 1 418 high-precision radial velocity observations from four observatories (Lick, Keck, Hobby-Eberly Telescope, Harlan J. Smith Telescope) and transit time/durations for the inner-most planet, 55 Cancri ‘e’ (Winn et al. 2011). We provide the first posterior sample for the masses and orbital parameters based on self-consistent N-body orbital solutions for the 55 Cancri planets, all of which are dynamically stable (for at least 108 yr). We apply a GPU version of Radial velocity Using N-body Differential evolution Markov Chain Monte Carlo (run dmc; Nelson, Ford & Payne) to perform a Bayesian analysis of the radial velocity and transit observations. Each of the planets in this remarkable system has unique characteristics. Our investigation of high-cadence radial velocities and priors based on space-based photometry yields an updated mass estimate for planet ‘e’ (8.09 ± 0.26 M⊕), which affects its density (|$5.51\pm ^{1.32}_{1.00}$| g cm−3) and inferred bulk composition. Dynamical stability dictates that the orbital plane of planet ‘e’ must be aligned to within 60° of the orbital plane of the outer planets (which we assume to be coplanar). The mutual interactions between the planets ‘b’ and ‘c’ may develop an apsidal lock about 180°. We find 36–45 per cent of all our model systems librate about the anti-aligned configuration with an amplitude of |$51^\circ \pm ^{6^\circ }_{10^\circ }$|. Other cases showed short-term perturbations in the libration of ϖb − ϖc, circulation, and nodding, but we find the planets are not in a 3:1 mean-motion resonance. A revised orbital period and eccentricity for planet ‘d’ pushes it further towards the closest known Jupiter analogue in the exoplanet population.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are nine super-Earths with good determinations of both their radius and mass: GJ 1214 b, 55 Cnc e, Kepler-36b, HD 97658 b, CoRoT-7b, HIP 116454 b, Kepler-78b, and Kepler-10b and 10c.
“There are nine super-Earths with good determinations of both their radius and mass: GJ 1214 b (Charbonneau et al., 2009), 55 Cnc e (Gillon et al., 2012; Nelson et al., 2014), Kepler-36b (Carter et al., 2012), HD 97658 b (Dragomir et al., 2013), CoRoT-7b (Barros et al., 2014; Haywood et al., 2014), HIP 116454 b (Vanderburg et al., 2015), Kepler-78b (Howard et al., 2013; Pepe et al., 2013), and Ke”
From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Nelson et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
A hybrid symplectic integrator that permits close encounters between massive bodies
Chambers, J. E. (1999) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02379.x · Cited by 1,820
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- Baluev, 2013, Astron. Comput., 3, 50, 10.1016/j.ascom.2013.11.003 · DOI
- Barnes, 2007, ApJ, 665, L67, 10.1086/521144 · DOI
- Bolmont, 2013, A&A, 556, A17, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220837 · DOI
- Butler, 1996, PASP, 108, 500, 10.1086/133755 · DOI
- Butler, 1997, ApJ, 474, L115, 10.1086/310444 · DOI
- Dawson, 2010, ApJ, 722, 937, 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/937 · DOI
- Demarque, 2004, ApJS, 155, 667, 10.1086/424966 · DOI
- Demory, 2011, A&A, 533, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117178 · DOI
- Demory, 2012, ApJ, 751, L28, 10.1088/2041-8205/751/2/L28 · DOI
- Dindar, 2013, New Astron., 23, 6, 10.1016/j.newast.2013.01.002 · DOI
- Dragomir, 2013, MOST Science Team
- Ehrenreich, 2012, A&A, 547, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219981 · DOI
- Endl, 2012, ApJ, 759, 19, 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/19 · DOI
- Fischer, 2008, ApJ, 675, 790, 10.1086/525512 · DOI
- Fischer, 2014, ApJS, 210, 5, 10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/5 · DOI
- Ford, 2006, ApJ, 642, 505, 10.1086/500802 · DOI
- Ford, 2007, ApJ, 664, L51, 10.1086/520579 · DOI
- Gillon, 2012, A&A, 539, A28, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118309 · DOI · Paper page
- Ji, 2003, ApJ, 585, L139, 10.1086/374391 · DOI
- Kaib, 2011, ApJ, 742, L24, 10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/L24 · DOI
- Ketchum, 2013, ApJ, 762, 71, 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/71 · DOI
- Kley, 2004, A&A, 414, 735, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031589 · DOI
- Kokubo, 1998, MNRAS, 297, 1067, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01581.x · DOI
- McArthur, 2004, ApJ, 614, L81, 10.1086/425561 · DOI
- McGrath, 2003, ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 294, Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets, 145
- Madhusudhan, 2012, ApJ, 759, L40, 10.1088/2041-8205/759/2/L40 · DOI
- Marcy, 1992, PASP, 104, 270, 10.1086/132989 · DOI
- Marcy, 2002, ApJ, 581, 1375, 10.1086/344298 · DOI
- Mugrauer, 2006, Astron. Nachr., 327, 321, 10.1002/asna.200510528 · DOI
- Nelson, 2014, ApJS, 210, 11, 10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/11 · DOI
- Raymond, 2008, ApJ, 689, 478, 10.1086/592772 · DOI
- Rivera, 2010, ApJ, 719, 890, 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/890 · DOI
- Tan, 2013, ApJ, 777, 101, 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/101 · DOI
- ter Braak, 2006, Stat. Comput., 16, 239, 10.1007/s11222-006-8769-1 · DOI
- Teske, 2013, ApJ, 778, 132, 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/132 · DOI
- Valenti, 1995, PASP, 107, 966, 10.1086/133645 · DOI
- Van Laerhoven, 2012, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 113, 215, 10.1007/s10569-012-9410-6 · DOI
- Veras, 2011, ApJ, 727, 74, 10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/74 · DOI
- Vogt, 1994, Proc. SPIE Conf. Ser., Vol. 2198, Instrumentation in Astronomy VIII, 362
- von Braun, 2011, ApJ, 740, 49, 10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/49 · DOI
- Winn, 2011, ApJ, 737, L18, 10.1088/2041-8205/737/1/L18 · DOI
- Zhou, 2004, MNRAS, 350, 1495, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07755.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Adamala, K., Arina de la Rubia, L., Bond, J., Dartnell, L. R., Goldman, A. D., Lynch, K., et al. (2016) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1460 · Cited by 136
“, 2009), 55 Cnc e (Gillon et al., 2012; Nelson et al., 2014), Kepler-36b (Carter et al.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, B. E., Ford, E. B., Wright, J. T., Fischer, D. A., von Braun, K., Howard, A. W., Payne, M. J., & Dindar, S.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nelson, Benjamin E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-04-25
- Volume
- 441
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 442-451
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2065486185
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 6.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX09AM41G, NNX09AB35G)
- Pennsylvania Space Grant Consortium
- University of Florida
- Pennsylvania State University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Keywords
- exoplanet masses, orbital elements, dynamic stability, mean motion resonance, libration, planet density, bulk composition, radial velocity, transit timing, 55 Cancri e
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review