The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
pastis: Bayesian extrasolar planet validation – I. General framework, models, and performance
Open accessAbstract
A large fraction of the smallest transiting planet candidates discovered by the Kepler and CoRoT space missions cannot be confirmed by a dynamical measurement of the mass using currently available observing facilities. To establish their planetary nature, the concept of planet validation has been advanced. This technique compares the probability of the planetary hypothesis against that of all reasonably conceivable alternative false positive (FP) hypotheses. The candidate is considered as validated if the posterior probability of the planetary hypothesis is sufficiently larger than the sum of the probabilities of all FP scenarios. In this paper, we present pastis, the Planet Analysis and Small Transit Investigation Software, a tool designed to perform a rigorous model comparison of the hypotheses involved in the problem of planet validation, and to fully exploit the information available in the candidate light curves. pastis self-consistently models the transit light curves and follow-up observations. Its object-oriented structure offers a large flexibility for defining the scenarios to be compared. The performance is explored using artificial transit light curves of planets and FPs with a realistic error distribution obtained from a Kepler light curve. We find that data support the correct hypothesis strongly only when the signal is high enough (transit signal-to-noise ratio above 50 for the planet case) and remain inconclusive otherwise. PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars (PLATO) shall provide transits with high enough signal-to-noise ratio, but to establish the true nature of the vast majority of Kepler and CoRoT transit candidates additional data or strong reliance on hypotheses priors is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Weak convergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms
Roberts, G. O., Gelman, A., & Gilks, W. R. (1997) · The Annals of Applied Probability · doi:10.1214/aoap/1034625254 · Cited by 1,693
The WASP Project and the SuperWASP Cameras
Pollacco, D. L., Skillen, I., Cameron, A. C., Christian, D. J., Hellier, C., Irwin, J., Lister, T. A., Street, R. A., West, R. G., Anderson, D., et al. (2006) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/508556 · Cited by 1,244 · cited 1×
“The most successful method to find them has proven to be the wide-field surveys carried out from the ground (e.g. Bakos et al. 2004; Pollacco et al. 2006) and from space-based observatories like CoRoT (Auvergne et al. 2009) and Kepler (Koch et al. 2010).”
MethodQueloz, D., Henry, G. W., Sivan, J. P., Baliunas, S. L., Beuzit, J. L., Donahue, R. A., Mayor, M., Naef, D., Perrier, C., & Udry, S. (2001) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011308 · Cited by 913 · cited 2×
“…University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society its mass.1 A series of diagnostics such as the study of the bisector velocity span (Queloz et al. 2001), or the comparison of the RV signatures obtained using different correlation masks (Bouchy et al. 2009; Dı́az et al. 2012) are…”
MethodGregory, P. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791277 · Cited by 750
The Occurrence and Mass Distribution of Close-in Super-Earths, Neptunes, and Jupiters
Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Johnson, J. A., Fischer, D. A., Wright, J. T., Isaacson, H., Valenti, J. A., Anderson, J., Lin, D. N. C., & Ida, S. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1194854 · Cited by 635
Kepler-22b: A 2.4 EARTH-RADIUS PLANET IN THE HABITABLE ZONE OF A SUN-LIKE STAR
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Batalha, N., Bryson, S. T., Rowe, J., Fressin, F., Torres, G., Caldwell, D. A., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/2/120 · Cited by 241
Two Earth-sized planets orbiting Kepler-20
Fressin, F., Torres, G., Rowe, J. F., Charbonneau, D., Rogers, L. A., Ballard, S., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., Buchhave, L. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10780 · Cited by 183
Mowlavi, N., Eggenberger, P., Meynet, G., Ekström, S., Georgy, C., Maeder, A., Charbonnel, C., & Eyer, L. (2012) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117749 · Cited by 135
Cited by
juliet: a versatile modelling tool for transiting and non-transiting exoplanetary systems
Espinoza, N., Kossakowski, D., & Brahm, R. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2688 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Díaz, R. F., Almenara, J. M., Santerne, A., Moutou, C., Lethuillier, A., & Deleuil, M.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-05-03
- Volume
- 441
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 983-1004
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2153130686
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 12.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: pastis: Bayesian extrasolar planet validation – I. General framework, models, and performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stu601
- The paper
- Díaz, R. F., Almenara, J. M., Santerne, A., Moutou, C., Lethuillier, A., & Deleuil, M. (2014). pastis: Bayesian extrasolar planet validation – I. General framework, models, and performance. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.