The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non-radial instabilities and progenitor asphericities in core-collapse supernovae
Open accessAbstract
Since core-collapse supernova simulations still struggle to produce robust neutrino-driven explosions in 3D, it has been proposed that asphericities caused by convection in the progenitor might facilitate shock revival by boosting the activity of non-radial hydrodynamic instabilities in the post-shock region. We investigate this scenario in depth using 42 relativistic 2D simulations with multigroup neutrino transport to examine the effects of velocity and density perturbations in the progenitor for different perturbation geometries that obey fundamental physical constraints (like the anelastic condition). As a framework for analysing our results, we introduce semi-empirical scaling laws relating neutrino heating, average turbulent velocities in the gain region, and the shock deformation in the saturation limit of non-radial instabilities. The squared turbulent Mach number, 〈Ma2〉, reflects the violence of aspherical motions in the gain layer, and explosive runaway occurs for 〈Ma2〉 ≳ 0.3, corresponding to a reduction of the critical neutrino luminosity by |$\mathord {\sim }25$| per cent compared to 1D. In the light of this theory, progenitor asphericities aid shock revival mainly by creating anisotropic mass flux on to the shock: differential infall efficiently converts velocity perturbations in the progenitor into density perturbations δρ/ρ at the shock of the order of the initial convective Mach number Maprog. The anisotropic mass flux and ram pressure deform the shock and thereby amplify post-shock turbulence. Large-scale (ℓ = 2, ℓ = 1) modes prove most conducive to shock revival, whereas small-scale perturbations require unrealistically high convective Mach numbers. Initial density perturbations in the progenitor are only of the order of |$\mathrm{Ma}_\mathrm{prog}^2$| and therefore play a subdominant role.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turbulent Convection in Stellar Interiors. I. Hydrodynamic Simulation
Meakin, C. A., & Arnett, D. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/520318 · Cited by 366
TURBULENT CONVECTION IN STELLAR INTERIORS. II. THE VELOCITY FIELD
Arnett, D., Meakin, C., & Young, P. A. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/690/2/1715 · Cited by 120
Cited by
Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. I
Zhou, Y. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.07.005 · Cited by 743
Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection
Mirizzi, A., Tamborra, I., Janka, H., Saviano, N., Scholberg, K., Bollig, R., Hüdepohl, L., & Chakraborty, S. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.15161/oar.it/1446204340.05 · Cited by 366
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Müller, B., & Janka, H.-T.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-02-26
- Volume
- 448
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2141-2174
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2014612100
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-radial instabilities and progenitor asphericities in core-collapse supernovae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stv101
- The paper
- Müller, B., & Janka, H.-T. (2015). Non-radial instabilities and progenitor asphericities in core-collapse supernovae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.