The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolution of the X-ray luminosity functions of unabsorbed and absorbed AGNs out to z∼ 5
Open accessAbstract
We present new measurements of the evolution of the X-ray luminosity functions (XLFs) of unabsorbed and absorbed Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) out to z~5. We construct samples containing 2957 sources detected at hard (2-7 keV) X-ray energies and 4351 sources detected at soft (0.5-2 keV) energies from a compilation of Chandra surveys supplemented by wide-area surveys from ASCA} and ROSAT. We consider the hard and soft X-ray samples separately and find that the XLF based on either (initially neglecting absorption effects) is best described by a new flexible model parametrization where the break luminosity, normalization and faint-end slope all evolve with redshift. We then incorporate absorption effects, separately modelling the evolution of the XLFs of unabsorbed ($20<\log N_\mathrm{H}<22$) and absorbed ($22<\log N_\mathrm{H}<24$) AGNs, seeking a model that can reconcile both the hard- and soft-band samples. We find that the absorbed AGN XLF has a lower break luminosity, a higher normalization, and a steeper faint-end slope than the unabsorbed AGN XLF out to z~2. Hence, absorbed AGNs dominate at low luminosities, with the absorbed fraction falling rapidly as luminosity increases. Both XLFs undergo strong luminosity evolution which shifts the transition in the absorbed fraction to higher luminosities at higher redshifts. The evolution in the shape of the total XLF is primarily driven by the changing mix of unabsorbed and absorbed populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
Cited by
Active galactic nuclei: what’s in a name?
Padovani, P., Alexander, D. M., Assef, R. J., De Marco, B., Giommi, P., Hickox, R. C., Richards, G. T., Smolčić, V., Hatziminaoglou, E., Mainieri, V., et al. (2017) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9 · Cited by 666
AGN wind scaling relations and the co-evolution of black holes and galaxies
Fiore, F., Feruglio, C., Shankar, F., Bischetti, M., Bongiorno, A., Brusa, M., Carniani, S., Cicone, C., Duras, F., Lamastra, A., et al. (2017) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629478 · Cited by 601
BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey. V. X-Ray Properties of the Swift/BAT 70-month AGN Catalog
Ricci, C., Trakhtenbrot, B., Koss, M. J., Ueda, Y., Del Vecchio, I., Treister, E., Schawinski, K., Paltani, S., Oh, K., Lamperti, I., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa96ad · Cited by 552
Larson, R. L., Finkelstein, S. L., Kocevski, D. D., Hutchison, T. A., Trump, J. R., Arrabal Haro, P., Bromm, V., Cleri, N. J., Dickinson, M., Fujimoto, S., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace619 · Cited by 363
Self-citationRadiation Backgrounds at Cosmic Dawn: X-Rays from Compact Binaries
Madau, P., & Fragos, T. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6af9 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Aird, J., Coil, A. L., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., Barro, G., & Pérez-González, P. G.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-06-09
- Volume
- 451
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1892-1927
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1911322997
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of the X-ray luminosity functions of unabsorbed and absorbed AGNs out to z∼ 5. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stv1062
- The paper
- Aird, J., Coil, A. L., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., Barro, G., & Pérez-González, P. G. (2015). The evolution of the X-ray luminosity functions of unabsorbed and absorbed AGNs out to z∼ 5. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.