Cited by 123Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The turbulent origin of spin–orbit misalignment in planetary systems

Open access
Fielding, Drummond B., McKee, Christopher F., Socrates, Aristotle, Cunningham, Andrew J., Klein, Richard I.·2015·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The turbulent environment from which stars form may lead to misalignment between the stellar spin and the remnant protoplanetary disc. By using hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic simulations, we demonstrate that a wide range of stellar obliquities may be produced as a by-product of forming a star within a turbulent environment. We present a simple semi-analytic model that reveals this connection between the turbulent motions and the orientation of a star and its disc. Our results are consistent with the observed obliquity distribution of hot Jupiters. Migration of misaligned hot Jupiters may, therefore, be due to tidal dissipation in the disc, rather than tidal dissipation of the star–planet interaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stv836

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Viable theories for the generation of planet-star misalignments include turbulence within the protostellar core, gravitational torques from primordial stellar companions, and magnetohydrodynamic interactions between stellar magnetospheres and inner disk edges.

    “Although the exact mechanism through which extrasolar spin-orbit misalignments are excited remains an active area of research, viable theories for the generation of planet-star misalignments include turbulence within the protostellar core (Bate et al., 2010; Spalding et al., 2014; Fielding et al., 2015), gravitational torques arising from primordial stellar companions (Batygin et al., 2012; Baty”

    From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Fielding et al., 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fielding, D. B., McKee, C. F., Socrates, A., Cunningham, A. J., & Klein, R. I.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2015-05-13
Volume
450
Issue
3
Pages
3306-3318
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1923310029
Cited by
123
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 4
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1106400, 1211729, 1053575)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
spin-orbit misalignment, stellar obliquity, protoplanetary disks, magnetohydrodynamic simulations, hot Jupiters, planet migration, tidal dissipation, stellar spin, semi-analytical model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review