What does the Bullet Cluster tell us about self-interacting dark matter?
Open accessAbstract
We perform numerical simulations of the merging galaxy cluster 1E 0657−56 (the Bullet Cluster), including the effects of elastic dark matter scattering. In a similar manner to the stripping of gas by ram pressure, dark matter self-interactions would transfer momentum between the two galaxy-cluster dark matter haloes, causing them to lag behind the collisionless galaxies. The absence of an observed separation between the dark matter and stellar components in the Bullet Cluster has been used to place upper limits on the cross-section for dark matter scattering. We emphasize the importance of analysing simulations in an observationally motivated manner, finding that the way in which the positions of the various components are measured can have a larger impact on derived constraints on dark matter's self-interaction cross-section than reasonable changes to the initial conditions for the merger. In particular, we find that the methods used in previous studies to place some of the tightest constraints on this cross-section do not reflect what is done observationally, and overstate the Bullet Cluster's ability to constrain the particle properties of dark matter. We introduce the first simulations of the Bullet Cluster including both self-interacting dark matter and gas. We find that as the gas is stripped it introduces radially dependent asymmetries into the stellar and dark matter distributions. As the techniques used to determine the positions of the dark matter and galaxies are sensitive to different radial scales, these asymmetries can lead to erroneously measured offsets between dark matter and galaxies even when they are spatially coincident.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SIDM simulations show a low-density bridge forming between the two peaks after first pericenter in a bimodal merger, which shifts the centroid but not the peak, which stays with the galaxies.
“In fact, SIDM simulations (Kahlhoefer et al. 2014;Kim et al. 2016;Robertson et al. 2017) show a low-density bridge forming between the two peaks after first pericenter in a bimodal merger.This shifts the centroid but not the peak, which stays with the galaxies.”
From The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters (2018) · cites this paper as Robertson et al. (2017)
Section 4.3 (p. 15) says that, after core passage, scattered dark-matter particles lag behind their halo and form a wake that can affect measured positions. Section 4.3.1 (p. 16) says stellar and dark-matter peak offsets become very small, but it does not describe a low-density bridge between the two peaks; it also cautions that the diffuse particles could shift a reconstructed dark-matter peak. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Dehnen W., Read J. I., 2011, European Physical Journal Plus, 126, 55
- Farrar G. R., Rosen R. A., 2007, Physical Review Letters, 98, 171302
- Kaplinghat M., Tulin S., Yu H.-B., 2016, Physical Review Letters, 116, 041302
- Kusenko A., Steinhardt P. J., 2001, Physical Review Letters, 87, 141301
- Loeb A., Weiner N., 2011, Physical Review Letters, 106, 171302
- Markevitch M., 2006, in Wilson A., ed., ESA Special Publication Vol. 604, The X-ray Universe 2005. p. 723
- Spergel D. N., Steinhardt P. J., 2000, Physical Review Letters, 84, 3760
- Tulin S., Yu H.-B., Zurek K. M., 2013b, Physical Review Letters, 110, 111301
- Wang W., Zhang M., Zhao J., 2016, preprint,
- ( arXiv:1604.00123 ) http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.00123 · arXiv
- Weinberg D. H., Bullock J. S., Governato F., Kuzio de Naray R., Peter A. H. G., 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 112, 12249
- van den Aarssen L. G., Bringmann T., Pfrommer C., 2012, Physical Review Letters, 109, 231301
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters
Wittman, D., Golovich, N., & Dawson, W. A. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaee77 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Robertson, A., Massey, R., & Eke, V.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Robertson, Andrew
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-10-17
- Volume
- 465
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 569-587
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2399215115
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 10.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/K501979/1, ST/L00075X/1)
- BIS National E-infrastructure capital (ST/K00042X/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/K00087X/1)
- STFC DiRAC (ST/K003267/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- Bullet Cluster, self-interacting dark matter, dark matter self-interaction cross section, cluster mergers, dark matter halos, ram pressure stripping, dark matter scattering, dark matter asymmetry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review