Cited by 5Historical Astronomy and Related StudiesHistory and Developments in AstronomyHistorical and Architectural Studies

Constraining ΔT from Babylonian lunar appulse and occultation observations

Open access
Gonzalez, Guillermo·2017·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We examine in detail 15 Babylonian observations of lunar appulses and occultations made between 80 and 419 BC for the purpose of setting useful limits on Earth's clock error, as quantified by $Δ$T, the difference between Terrestrial Time and Universal time. Our results are generally in agreement with reconstructions of $Δ$T using untimed solar eclipse observations from the same period. We suggest a revised version of the simple quadratic fit to $Δ$T in light of the new results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stx1316

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 5

Authors
Gonzalez, G.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2017-05-29
Volume
470
Issue
2
Pages
1436-1441
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2618517303
Cited by
5
References
8
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical and Architectural Studies
Keywords
universal time, Earth rotation, Babylonian astronomy, lunar occultations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review