In the wake of dark giants: new signatures of dark matter self-interactions in equal-mass mergers of galaxy clusters
Open accessAbstract
Merging galaxy clusters have been touted as one of the best probes for constraining self-interacting dark matter, but few simulations exist to back up this claim. We simulate equal-mass mergers of 1015 M⊙ haloes, like the El Gordo and Sausage clusters, with cosmologically motivated halo and merger parameters, and with velocity-independent dark-matter self-interactions. Although the standard lore for merging clusters is that self-interactions lead to large separations between the galaxy and dark-matter distributions, we find that maximal galaxy–dark matter offsets of ≲20 kpc form for a self-interaction cross-section of σSI/mχ = 1 cm2 g−1. This is an order of magnitude smaller than those measured in observed equal-mass and near-equal-mass mergers, and is likely to be even smaller for lower mass systems. While competitive cross-section constraints are thus unlikely to emerge from offsets, we find other signatures of self-interactions that are more promising. Intriguingly, we find that after dark-matter haloes coalesce, the collisionless galaxies [and especially the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG)] oscillate around the centre of the merger remnant on stable orbits of 100 kpc for σSI/mχ = 1 cm2 g−1 for at least several Gyr, well after the clusters have relaxed. If BCG miscentring in relaxed clusters remains a robust prediction of self-interacting dark matter under the addition of gas physics, substructure, merger mass ratios (e.g. 10:1 like the Bullet Cluster) and complex cosmological merger histories, the observed BCG offsets may constrain σSI/mχ to ≲0.1 cm2 g−1 – the tightest constraint yet.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Galaxies often undergo significant sloshing motions within the dark matter halo on timescales much shorter than the overall cluster orbital period.
“Instead, galaxies often undergo significant sloshing motions within the dark matter halo on timescales much shorter than the overall cluster orbital period (S.Y. Kim et al. 2017).”
From A New Robust Constraint on the Self-interaction Cross Section of Dark Matter with Double Radio Relic Clusters (2026) · cites this paper as S.Y. Kim et al. 2017
Section 4.1 (p. 12) reports that, after dark-matter halos coalesce in simulated self-interacting dark matter mergers, galaxy peaks can continue oscillating around the halo's barycenter by hundreds of kiloparsecs. The paper does not establish that this often happens in clusters generally or that the sloshing timescale is much shorter than the overall cluster orbital period. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGalaxies are not perfect tracers of the dark matter potential.
“The primary challenge arises from the complex dynamical behavior of galaxies that are not perfect tracers of the dark matter potential.”
From A New Robust Constraint on the Self-interaction Cross Section of Dark Matter with Double Radio Relic Clusters (2026) · cites this paper as S.Y. Kim et al. 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Pfrommer C., 2015, preprint, (arXiv:1512.05344) Dalal N., Kochanek C. S., 2002, ApJ, 572, 25 Davé R., Spergel D. N., Steinhardt P. J., Wandelt B. D., 2001, ApJ, 547, 574 Dawson W. A., 2013, PhD thesis, University of California, Davis Dawson W. A., et al., 2012, ApJ, 747, L42 Donahue M., et al., 2016, ApJ, 819, 36 Dooley G. A., Peter A. H. G., Vogelsberger M., Zavala J., Frebel A., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1603.08919) Duffy A. R., Schaye J., Kay S. T., Dalla Vecchia C., 2008, MNRAS, 390, · arXiv
- MNRAS 000, 1–30 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.015014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.015014 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009PhRvD..79a5014A http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123516 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PhRvD..92l3516A http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.115017 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PhRvD..89k5017B http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01074.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.415L..40B http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/591246 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...687..959B http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/22 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...765...22B http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.083522 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PhRvD..81h3522B http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.043524 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PhRvD..90d3524B http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20663.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423..104B http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/128 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...758..128C http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015arXiv151205344C http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.05344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/340303 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...572...25D http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/318417 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...547..574D http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/747/2/L42 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...747L..42D http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/36 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...819...36D http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv160308919D http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00537.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.390L..64D http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.390L..64D http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.151301 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PhRvL.104o1301F http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21623.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.425.2817F http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/161209 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...271..417F http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/2 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757....2G http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/308342 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...530...62G http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2357 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988PhRvD..38.2357G http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2120 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446..578G http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu337 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.441..404H http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1261381 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Sci...347.1462H http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Sci...347.1462H http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01511.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.297..517H http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/168845 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...356..359H http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1271 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452..998H http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/780/2/L16 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780L..16H · DOI
- Huff E. M., Krause E., Eifler T., George M. R., Schlegel D., 2013, preprint, (arXiv:1311.1489) · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jee, M. J., Park, D., & Lee, W. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae88fb · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, S. Y., Peter, A. H. G., & Wittman, D.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Stacy Y.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-04-12
- Volume
- 469
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1414-1444
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2512274474
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- NSF (1518246)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- self-interacting dark matter, cluster mergers, El Gordo, Bullet Cluster
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review