Cited by 121Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation Theories

In the wake of dark giants: new signatures of dark matter self-interactions in equal-mass mergers of galaxy clusters

Open access
Kim, Stacy Y., Peter, Annika H. G., Wittman, David·2017·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Merging galaxy clusters have been touted as one of the best probes for constraining self-interacting dark matter, but few simulations exist to back up this claim. We simulate equal-mass mergers of 1015 M⊙ haloes, like the El Gordo and Sausage clusters, with cosmologically motivated halo and merger parameters, and with velocity-independent dark-matter self-interactions. Although the standard lore for merging clusters is that self-interactions lead to large separations between the galaxy and dark-matter distributions, we find that maximal galaxy–dark matter offsets of ≲20 kpc form for a self-interaction cross-section of σSI/mχ = 1 cm2 g−1. This is an order of magnitude smaller than those measured in observed equal-mass and near-equal-mass mergers, and is likely to be even smaller for lower mass systems. While competitive cross-section constraints are thus unlikely to emerge from offsets, we find other signatures of self-interactions that are more promising. Intriguingly, we find that after dark-matter haloes coalesce, the collisionless galaxies [and especially the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG)] oscillate around the centre of the merger remnant on stable orbits of 100 kpc for σSI/mχ = 1 cm2 g−1 for at least several Gyr, well after the clusters have relaxed. If BCG miscentring in relaxed clusters remains a robust prediction of self-interacting dark matter under the addition of gas physics, substructure, merger mass ratios (e.g. 10:1 like the Bullet Cluster) and complex cosmological merger histories, the observed BCG offsets may constrain σSI/mχ to ≲0.1 cm2 g−1 – the tightest constraint yet.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stx896

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Galaxies often undergo significant sloshing motions within the dark matter halo on timescales much shorter than the overall cluster orbital period.

    “Instead, galaxies often undergo significant sloshing motions within the dark matter halo on timescales much shorter than the overall cluster orbital period (S.Y. Kim et al. 2017).”

    From A New Robust Constraint on the Self-interaction Cross Section of Dark Matter with Double Radio Relic Clusters (2026) · cites this paper as S.Y. Kim et al. 2017

    Section 4.1 (p. 12) reports that, after dark-matter halos coalesce in simulated self-interacting dark matter mergers, galaxy peaks can continue oscillating around the halo's barycenter by hundreds of kiloparsecs. The paper does not establish that this often happens in clusters generally or that the sloshing timescale is much shorter than the overall cluster orbital period. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Galaxies are not perfect tracers of the dark matter potential.

    “The primary challenge arises from the complex dynamical behavior of galaxies that are not perfect tracers of the dark matter potential.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Pfrommer C., 2015, preprint, (arXiv:1512.05344) Dalal N., Kochanek C. S., 2002, ApJ, 572, 25 Davé R., Spergel D. N., Steinhardt P. J., Wandelt B. D., 2001, ApJ, 547, 574 Dawson W. A., 2013, PhD thesis, University of California, Davis Dawson W. A., et al., 2012, ApJ, 747, L42 Donahue M., et al., 2016, ApJ, 819, 36 Dooley G. A., Peter A. H. G., Vogelsberger M., Zavala J., Frebel A., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1603.08919) Duffy A. R., Schaye J., Kay S. T., Dalla Vecchia C., 2008, MNRAS, 390, · arXiv
  2. MNRAS 000, 1–30 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.015014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.015014 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009PhRvD..79a5014A http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123516 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PhRvD..92l3516A http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.115017 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PhRvD..89k5017B http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01074.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.415L..40B http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/591246 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...687..959B http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/22 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...765...22B http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.083522 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PhRvD..81h3522B http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.043524 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PhRvD..90d3524B http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20663.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423..104B http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/128 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...758..128C http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015arXiv151205344C http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.05344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/340303 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...572...25D http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/318417 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...547..574D http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/747/2/L42 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...747L..42D http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/36 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...819...36D http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv160308919D http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00537.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.390L..64D http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.390L..64D http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.151301 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PhRvL.104o1301F http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21623.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.425.2817F http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/161209 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...271..417F http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/2 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757....2G http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/308342 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...530...62G http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2357 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988PhRvD..38.2357G http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2120 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446..578G http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu337 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.441..404H http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1261381 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Sci...347.1462H http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Sci...347.1462H http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01511.x http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.297..517H http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/168845 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...356..359H http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1271 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452..998H http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/780/2/L16 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780L..16H · DOI
  3. Huff E. M., Krause E., Eifler T., George M. R., Schlegel D., 2013, preprint, (arXiv:1311.1489) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S. Y., Peter, A. H. G., & Wittman, D.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Stacy Y.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2017-04-12
Volume
469
Issue
2
Pages
1414-1444
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2512274474
Cited by
121
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
NSF (1518246)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
self-interacting dark matter, cluster mergers, El Gordo, Bullet Cluster

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review