Cited by 50Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

A volumetric deep Convolutional Neural Network for simulation of mock dark matter halo catalogues

Open access
Berger, Philippe, Stein, George·2019·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

For modern large-scale structure survey techniques it has become standard practice to test data analysis pipelines on large suites of mock simulations, a task which is currently prohibitively expensive for full N-body simulations. Instead of calculating this costly gravitational evolution, we have trained a three-dimensional deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to identify dark matter protohaloes directly from the cosmological initial conditions. Training on halo catalogues from the Peak Patch semi-analytic code, we test various CNN architectures and find they generically achieve a Dice coefficient of ∼92 per cent in only 24 h of training. We present a simple and fast geometric halo finding algorithm to extract haloes from this powerful pixel-wise binary classifier and find that the predicted catalogues match the mass function and power spectra of the ground truth simulations to within ∼10 per cent. We investigate the effect of long-range tidal forces on an object-by-object basis and find that the network’s predictions are consistent with the non-linear ellipsoidal collapse equations used explicitly by the Peak Patch algorithm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/sty2949

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berger, P., & Stein, G.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Berger, Philippe
  • Stein, George
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2018-11-01
Volume
482
Issue
3
Pages
2861-2871
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2799470320
Cited by
50
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Centrum fÖr Personcentrerad Vård
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
dark matter halos, deep convolutional neural networks, cosmological initial conditions, tidal forces, ellipsoidal collapse, halo mass function, power spectrum, large-scale structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review