A volumetric deep Convolutional Neural Network for simulation of mock dark matter halo catalogues
Open accessAbstract
For modern large-scale structure survey techniques it has become standard practice to test data analysis pipelines on large suites of mock simulations, a task which is currently prohibitively expensive for full N-body simulations. Instead of calculating this costly gravitational evolution, we have trained a three-dimensional deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to identify dark matter protohaloes directly from the cosmological initial conditions. Training on halo catalogues from the Peak Patch semi-analytic code, we test various CNN architectures and find they generically achieve a Dice coefficient of ∼92 per cent in only 24 h of training. We present a simple and fast geometric halo finding algorithm to extract haloes from this powerful pixel-wise binary classifier and find that the predicted catalogues match the mass function and power spectra of the ground truth simulations to within ∼10 per cent. We investigate the effect of long-range tidal forces on an object-by-object basis and find that the network’s predictions are consistent with the non-linear ellipsoidal collapse equations used explicitly by the Peak Patch algorithm.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 · Cited by 4,196 · see citing works
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Alarcon, A., Aleksić, J., Allam, S., Allen, S., Amara, A., Annis, J., Asorey, J., Avila, S., et al. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043526 · Cited by 1,213 · see citing works
Non-Gaussian information from weak lensing data via deep learning
Gupta, A., Matilla, J. M. Z., Hsu, D., & Haiman, Z. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103515 · Cited by 128 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In cosmology, machine learning techniques have shown promise for the purposes of cosmological parameter estimation (Ravanbakhsh et al. 2017; Gupta et al. 2018; Gillet et al. 2018), simulating twodimensional slices of the non-linear density field (Rodriguez et al. 2018), initial conditions…”
BackgroundCosmological reconstruction from galaxy light: neural network based light-matter connection
Modi, C., Feng, Y., & Seljak, U. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/028 · Cited by 86 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…Gillet et al. 2018), simulating twodimensional slices of the non-linear density field (Rodriguez et al. 2018), initial conditions reconstruction (Modi et al. 2018), as well as classifying evolved structures in N-body simulations (Aragon-Calvo 2018) (who uses a similar CNN architecture to that…”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys
Huertas-Company, M., & Lanusse, F. (2023) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.55 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“Berger & Stein (2018) introduced the first deep CNN model to identify dark matter halos with this approach, relying on V-net model illustrated in Berger & Stein (2018).”
MethodDistinguishing standard and modified gravity cosmologies with machine learning
Peel, A., Lalande, F., Starck, J.-L., Pettorino, V., Merten, J., Giocoli, C., Meneghetti, M., & Baldi, M. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.023508 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Nonlinear 3D cosmic web simulation with heavy-tailed generative adversarial networks
Feder, R. M., Berger, P., & Stein, G. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.103504 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Image-to-image mapping techniques that transform initial conditions to the final structures [12–14] or augment dark matter-only simulation results with various physical effects not present in the simulation [15–20] have shown promise.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Berger, P., & Stein, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Berger, Philippe
- Stein, George
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-11-01
- Volume
- 482
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2861-2871
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2799470320
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Centrum fÖr Personcentrerad Vård
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Keywords
- dark matter halos, deep convolutional neural networks, cosmological initial conditions, tidal forces, ellipsoidal collapse, halo mass function, power spectrum, large-scale structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review