psfgan: a generative adversarial network system for separating quasar point sources and host galaxy light
Open accessAbstract
The study of unobscured active galactic nuclei (AGN) and quasars depends on the reliable decomposition of the light from the AGN point source and the extended host galaxy light. The problem is typically approached using parametric fitting routines using separate models for the host galaxy and the point spread function (PSF). We present a new approach using a Generative Adversarial Network (gan) trained on galaxy images. We test the method using Sloan Digital Sky Survey r-band images with artificial AGN point sources added that are then removed using the gan and with parametric methods using galfit. When the AGN point source is more than twice as bright as the host galaxy, we find that our method, psfgan, can recover point source and host galaxy magnitudes with smaller systematic error and a lower average scatter (|$49\hbox{ per cent}$|). psfgan is more tolerant to poor knowledge of the PSF than parametric methods. Our tests show that psfgan is robust against a broadening in the PSF width of |$\pm 50\hbox{ per cent}$| if it is trained on multiple PSFs. We demonstrate that while a matched training set does improve performance, we can still subtract point sources using a psfgan trained on non-astronomical images. While initial training is computationally expensive, evaluating psfgan on data is more than 40 times faster than galfit fitting two components. Finally, psfgan is more robust and easy to use than parametric methods as it requires no input parameters.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stark et al. (2018) demonstrate that their approach is more than 40 times faster than standard model fitting approaches.
“In line with works under the same category, the authors demonstrate that their approach is more than 40 times faster than standard model fitting approaches.”
From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Stark et al. (2018)
Section 3.1 reports that PSFGAN was about 48.3 times faster than GALFIT in their specific comparison when PSFGAN ran on a GPU. The Discussion qualifies this as inference-phase speed: on the same CPU, PSFGAN was about 3.6 times faster, and training took about eight hours. The unqualified claim overgeneralizes the more-than-40-fold result. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892 · see citing works
Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., Raddick, M. J., Nichol, R. C., Szalay, A., Andreescu, D., et al. (2008) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x · Cited by 1,488 · see citing works
Self-citationSchawinski, K., Zhang, C., Zhang, H., Fowler, L., & Santhanam, G. K. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx008 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationDeep learning for galaxy surface brightness profile fitting
Tuccillo, D., Huertas-Company, M., Decencière, E., Velasco-Forero, S., Domínguez Sánchez, H., & Dimauro, P. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3186 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- Bahcall J. N., Kirhakos S., Schneider D. P., 1995, ApJ, 450, 486 · DOI
- Bahcall J. N., Kirhakos S., Saxe D. H., Schneider D. P., 1997, ApJ, 479, 642 · DOI
- Barden M., Häußler B., Peng C. Y., McIntosh D. H., Guo Y., 2012, MNRAS, 422, 449 · DOI
- Baron D., Poznanski D., 2017, MNRAS, 465, 4530 · DOI
- Bennert N., Canalizo G., Jungwiert B., Stockton A., Schweizer F., Peng C. Y., Lacy M., 2008, ApJ, 677, 846 · DOI
- Blanton M. R. et al., 2017, AJ, 154, 28 · DOI
- Boyce P. J., Disney M. J., Bleaken D. G., 1999, MNRAS, 302, L39 · DOI
- Chang Y.-Y., van der Wel A., da Cunha E., Rix H.-W., 2015, ApJS, 219, 8 · DOI
- Collinson J. S., Ward M. J., Done C., Landt H., Elvis M., McDowell J. C., 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2174 · DOI
- Dieleman S., Willett K. W., Dambre J., 2015, MNRAS, 450, 1441 · DOI · Paper page
- Gabor J. M. et al., 2009, ApJ, 691, 705 · DOI
- Goodfellow I. J., Pouget-Abadie J., Mirza M., Xu B., Warde-Farley D., Ozair S., Courville A., Bengio Y., 2014, NIPS, 2672 (arXiv:1406.2661) · arXiv
- Goulding A. D., Alexander D. M., Lehmer B. D., Mullaney J. R., 2010, MNRAS, 406, 597 · DOI
- Grogin N. A. et al., 2011, ApJS, 197, 35 · DOI
- Hernán-Caballero A., Alonso-Herrero A., Pérez-González P. G., Cava A., Cardiel N., the SHARDS Team 2013, preprint (arXiv:1305.0641) · arXiv
- Hooper E. J., Impey C. D., Foltz C. B., 1997, ApJ, 480, L95 · DOI
- Isola P., Zhu J.-Y., Zhou T., Efros A. A., 2017, IEEE Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, p. 5967
- Kim M., Ho L. C., Im M., 2006, ApJ, 642, 702 · DOI
- Kim M., Ho L. C., Peng C. Y., Barth A. J., Im M., 2008, ApJS, 179, 283 · DOI
- Kingma D. P., Ba J., 2015, 3rd International Conference for Learning Rep- resentations, San Diego
- Kirhakos S., Bahcall J. N., Schneider D. P., Kristian J., 1999, ApJ, 520, 67 · DOI
- Koekemoer A. M. et al., 2011, ApJS, 197, 36 · DOI
- Koss M., Mushotzky R., Veilleux S., Winter L. M., Baumgartner W., Tueller J., Gehrels N., Valencic L., 2011, ApJ, 739, 57 · DOI
- Lehnert M. D., van Breugel W. J. M., Heckman T. M., Miley G. K., 1999, ApJS, 124, 11 · DOI
- Lintott C. et al., 2011, MNRAS, 410, 166 · DOI
- McLeod K. K., Rieke G. H., 1995, ApJ, 454, L77 · DOI
- Matsuoka Y., Strauss M. A., Price T. N., III, DiDonato M. S., 2014, ApJ, 780, 162 · DOI
- Peng C. Y., Ho L. C., Impey C. D., Rix H.-W., 2002, AJ, 124, 266 · DOI
- Peng C. Y., Ho L. C., Impey C. D., Rix H.-W., 2010, AJ, 139, 2097 · DOI
- Reed S., Akata Z., Yan X., Logeswaran L., Schiele B., Lee H., 2016, in Balcan M. F., Weinberger K. Q., eds, Proc. The 33rd International Con- ference on Machine Learning, Vol. 48. PMLR, New York, p. 1060
- Reines A. E., Volonteri M., 2015, ApJ, 813, 82 · DOI
- Robotham A. S. G., Taranu D. S., Tobar R., Moffett A., Driver S. P., 2017, MNRAS, 466, 1513 · DOI
- Santini P. et al., 2015, ApJ, 801, 97 · DOI
- Schawinski K. et al., 2006, Nature, 442, 888 · DOI
- Schawinski K., Treister E., Urry C. M., Cardamone C. N., Simmons B., Yi S. K., 2011, ApJ, 727, L31 · DOI
- Shimizu T. T., Mushotzky R. F., Meléndez M., Koss M., Rosario D. J., 2015, MNRAS, 452, 1841 · DOI
- Simmons B. D., Urry C. M., 2008, ApJ, 683, 644 · DOI
- TeamSimmons B. D., Van Duyne J., Urry C. M., Treister E., Koekemoer A. M., Grogin N. A., 2011, ApJ, 734, 121 · DOI
- Sola J., Sevilla J., 1997, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 44, 1464 · DOI
- Stetson P. B., 1987, PASP, 99, 191 · DOI
- Stoughton C. et al., 2002, AJ, 123, 485 · DOI
- Vikram V., Wadadekar Y., Kembhavi A. K., Vijayagovindan G. V., 2010, MNRAS, 409, 1379 · DOI
- Yoon I., Weinberg M. D., Katz N., 2011, MNRAS, 414, 1625 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys
Huertas-Company, M., & Lanusse, F. (2023) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.55 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“Stark et al. (2018) used a Generative Model to measure the photometry of AGN hosts.”
MethodBuilding Continuous Integration Services for Machine Learning
Karlaš, B., Interlandi, M., Renggli, C., Wu, W., Zhang, C., Mukunthu Iyappan Babu, D., Edwards, J., Lauren, C., Xu, A., & Weimer, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3394486.3403290 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Stark, D., Launet, B., Schawinski, K., Zhang, C., Koss, M., Turp, M. D., Sartori, L. F., Zhang, H., Chen, Y., & Weigel, A. K.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Peking University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Stark, Dominic
- Launet, Barthelemy
- Schawinski, Kevin
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-03-22
- Volume
- 477
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2513-2527
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2789663542
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA contract NAS5-26555, NNH16CT03C, NAS 526555)
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Princeton University
- Ohio State University
- University of Washington
- Johns Hopkins University
- University of Pittsburgh
- Case Western Reserve University
- Drexel University
- Universität Basel
- University of Portsmouth
- New Mexico State University
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (26555, PZ00P2, 154799)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie
- U.S. Naval Observatory
- Fermilab
- Los Alamos National Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- generative adversarial networks, point spread function, quasars
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review