Cited by 67Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesCosmology and Gravitation Theories

Origins of scaling relations of globular cluster systems

Open access
Choksi, Nick, Gnedin, Oleg Y·2019·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Globular cluster (GC) systems demonstrate tight scaling relations with the properties of their host galaxies. In previous work, we developed an analytic model for GC formation in a cosmological context that matches nearly all of these observed scaling relations. Here, we apply our model to investigate in detail the physical origins and evolution of these scaling relations. The ratio of the combined mass in GCs MGC to the host dark matter halo mass Mh is nearly constant at all redshifts, but its normalization evolves by a factor of ∼10 from birth to z = 0. The relation is steeper than linear at halo masses $M_{\mathrm{h}}\lesssim 10^{11.5}\, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$, primarily due to non-linearity in the stellar mass–halo mass relation. The near constancy of the ratio MGC/Mh, combined with the shape of the stellar mass–halo mass relation, sets the characteristic U shape of the GC specific frequency as a function of host galaxy mass. The contribution of accreted satellite galaxies to the buildup of GC systems is a strong function of the host galaxy mass, ranging from ≈0 per cent at $M_{\mathrm{h}}\approx 10^{11} \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$ to 80 per cent at $M_{\mathrm{h}}\approx 10^{15} \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$. The metal-poor clusters are significantly more likely to form ex situ relative to the metal-rich clusters, but a substantial fraction of metal-poor clusters still form in situ in lower mass galaxies. Cluster formation occurs essentially continuously at high redshift, while at low redshift galactic mergers become increasingly important for cluster formation. Consequently, although major mergers form clusters efficiently, they are too rare to form most clusters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stz2097

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 106 · Cited by 67

Authors
Choksi, N., & Gnedin, O. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Choksi, Nick
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2019-07-31
Volume
488
Issue
4
Pages
5409-5419
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2944967129
Cited by
67
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1412144)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
globular cluster systems, scaling laws, halo mass, stellar mass-halo mass relation, specific frequency, satellite galaxy accretion, metal-poor globular clusters, galaxy mergers, globular cluster formation, cosmological evolution, galaxy mass evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review