Origins of scaling relations of globular cluster systems
Open accessAbstract
Globular cluster (GC) systems demonstrate tight scaling relations with the properties of their host galaxies. In previous work, we developed an analytic model for GC formation in a cosmological context that matches nearly all of these observed scaling relations. Here, we apply our model to investigate in detail the physical origins and evolution of these scaling relations. The ratio of the combined mass in GCs MGC to the host dark matter halo mass Mh is nearly constant at all redshifts, but its normalization evolves by a factor of ∼10 from birth to z = 0. The relation is steeper than linear at halo masses $M_{\mathrm{h}}\lesssim 10^{11.5}\, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$, primarily due to non-linearity in the stellar mass–halo mass relation. The near constancy of the ratio MGC/Mh, combined with the shape of the stellar mass–halo mass relation, sets the characteristic U shape of the GC specific frequency as a function of host galaxy mass. The contribution of accreted satellite galaxies to the buildup of GC systems is a strong function of the host galaxy mass, ranging from ≈0 per cent at $M_{\mathrm{h}}\approx 10^{11} \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$ to 80 per cent at $M_{\mathrm{h}}\approx 10^{15} \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$. The metal-poor clusters are significantly more likely to form ex situ relative to the metal-rich clusters, but a substantial fraction of metal-poor clusters still form in situ in lower mass galaxies. Cluster formation occurs essentially continuously at high redshift, while at low redshift galactic mergers become increasingly important for cluster formation. Consequently, although major mergers form clusters efficiently, they are too rare to form most clusters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The scaling relations between the number of GCs and the host galaxy mass evolve with redshift.
“suggesting that the scaling relations between the number of GCs and the host galaxy mass evolve with redshift (e.g. Kruijssen 2015; Choksi & Gnedin 2019, Bastian et al. in prep.).”
From Kraken reveals itself – the merger history of the Milky Way reconstructed with the E-MOSAICS simulations (2020) · cites this paper as Choksi & Gnedin 2019
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 106 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Choksi, N., & Gnedin, O. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Choksi, Nick
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-07-31
- Volume
- 488
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 5409-5419
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2944967129
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1412144)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- globular cluster systems, scaling laws, halo mass, stellar mass-halo mass relation, specific frequency, satellite galaxy accretion, metal-poor globular clusters, galaxy mergers, globular cluster formation, cosmological evolution, galaxy mass evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review