Prediction of galaxy halo masses in SDSS DR7 via a machine learning approach
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT We present a machine learning (ML) approach for the prediction of galaxies’ dark matter halo masses which achieves an improved performance over conventional methods. We train three ML algorithms (XGBoost, random forests, and neural network) to predict halo masses using a set of synthetic galaxy catalogues that are built by populating dark matter haloes in N-body simulations with galaxies and that match both the clustering and the joint distributions of properties of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We explore the correlation of different galaxy- and group-related properties with halo mass, and extract the set of nine features that contribute the most to the prediction of halo mass. We find that mass predictions from the ML algorithms are more accurate than those from halo abundance matching (HAM) or dynamical mass estimates (DYN). Since the danger of this approach is that our training data might not accurately represent the real Universe, we explore the effect of testing the model on synthetic catalogues built with different assumptions than the ones used in the training phase. We test a variety of models with different ways of populating dark matter haloes, such as adding velocity bias for satellite galaxies. We determine that, though training and testing on different data can lead to systematic errors in predicted masses, the ML approach still yields substantially better masses than either HAM or DYN. Finally, we apply the trained model to a galaxy and group catalogue from the SDSS DR7 and present the resulting halo masses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A problem with using ML to estimate halo masses from galaxy properties is that secondary dependencies of halo masses on galaxy properties might be very model dependent, which can induce systematic biases in the inferred dark matter masses that do not exist in simpler approaches.
“A problem with this approach, acknowledged by the authors, is that secondary dependencies of halo masses on galaxy properties might be very model dependent. This can therefore induce systematic biases in the inferred dark matter masses which do not exist in simpler approaches.”
From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Calderon & Berlind (2019)
Cites
GALAXY CLUSTERS DISCOVERED WITH A SUNYAEV-ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT SURVEY
Staniszewski, Z., Ade, P. A. R., Aird, K. A., Benson, B. A., Bleem, L. E., Carlstrom, J. E., Chang, C. L., Cho, H.-M., Crawford, T. M., Crites, A. T., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/701/1/32 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys
Huertas-Company, M., & Lanusse, F. (2023) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.55 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“Calderon & Berlind (2019) explored several machine learning algorithms, including neural networks, for estimating the dark matter halo masses of galaxies in the SDSS.”
BackgroundDynamical mass inference of galaxy clusters with neural flows
Kodi Ramanah, D., Wojtak, R., Ansari, Z., Gall, C., & Hjorth, J. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2886 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Calderon, V. F., & Berlind, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Calderon, Victor F
- Berlind, Andreas A
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-10-04
- Volume
- 490
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2367-2379
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2914193216
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (AST-1151650)
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence (CE170100013)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- machine learning, XGBoost, random forest, artificial neural networks, N-body simulations, galaxy clustering, SDSS DR7, galaxy groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review