Cited by 60Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation

Photometry of high-redshift blended galaxies using deep learning

Open access
Boucaud, Alexandre, Huertas-Company, Marc, Heneka, Caroline, Ishida, Emille E O, Sedaghat, Nima, de Souza, Rafael S, Moews, Ben, Dole, Hervé +7 more·2020·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The new generation of deep photometric surveys requires unprecedentedly precise shape and photometry measurements of billions of galaxies to achieve their main science goals. At such depths, one major limiting factor is the blending of galaxies due to line-of-sight projection, with an expected fraction of blended galaxies of up to 50 per cent. This proof-of-concept work explores for the first time the use of deep neural networks to estimate the photometry of blended pairs of galaxies in space-based monochrome images similar to the ones that will be delivered by the Euclidspace telescope under simplified idealized conditions. Using a clean sample of isolated galaxies from the CANDELS survey, we artificially blend them and train two different network models to recover the photometry of the two galaxies. We show that our approach can recover the original photometry of the galaxies before being blended with $\sim 7{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ mean absolute percentage error on flux estimations without any human intervention and without any assumption on the galaxy shape. This represents an improvement of at least a factor of 4 compared to the classical SExtractor approach. We also show that, forcing the network to simultaneously estimate fractional segmentation maps results in a slightly improved photometry. All data products and codes have been made public to ease the comparison with other approaches on a common data set. See https://github.com/aboucaud/coindeblend.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stz3056

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Boucaud et al. (2020) showed that measured photometry of pairs of galaxies is improved with respect to the standard SEXTRACTOR based approach using a Unet.

    “In this proof-of-concept work, it is shown that the measured photometry of pairs of galaxies is improved with respect to the standard SEXTRACTOR based approach”

    From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Boucaud et al. (2020)

  • Boucaud et al. (2020) tested their method in an idealised setting where the stamps only contained two images with one galaxy at the centre.

    “However, this was tested in an idealised setting where the stamps only contained two images with one galaxy at the centre.”

    From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Boucaud et al. (2020)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boucaud, A., Huertas-Company, M., Heneka, C., Ishida, E. E. O., Sedaghat, N., de Souza, R. S., Moews, B., Dole, H., Castellano, M., Merlin, E., Roscani, V., Tramacere, A., Killedar, M., Trindade, A. M. M., & Collaboration for the COIN
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), E-38200, La Laguna, Spain
  • Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, USA
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400 Orsay, France
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Astronomical Observatory of Rome (IT)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Boucaud, Alexandre
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2019-12-02
Volume
491
Issue
2
Pages
2481-2495
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2953475150
Cited by
60
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
NASA (14-ATP14-0007)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Keywords
galaxy blending, photometry, deep neural network, high-redshift galaxies, CANDELS, segmentation maps, photometric surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review