Photometry of high-redshift blended galaxies using deep learning
Open accessAbstract
The new generation of deep photometric surveys requires unprecedentedly precise shape and photometry measurements of billions of galaxies to achieve their main science goals. At such depths, one major limiting factor is the blending of galaxies due to line-of-sight projection, with an expected fraction of blended galaxies of up to 50 per cent. This proof-of-concept work explores for the first time the use of deep neural networks to estimate the photometry of blended pairs of galaxies in space-based monochrome images similar to the ones that will be delivered by the Euclidspace telescope under simplified idealized conditions. Using a clean sample of isolated galaxies from the CANDELS survey, we artificially blend them and train two different network models to recover the photometry of the two galaxies. We show that our approach can recover the original photometry of the galaxies before being blended with $\sim 7{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ mean absolute percentage error on flux estimations without any human intervention and without any assumption on the galaxy shape. This represents an improvement of at least a factor of 4 compared to the classical SExtractor approach. We also show that, forcing the network to simultaneously estimate fractional segmentation maps results in a slightly improved photometry. All data products and codes have been made public to ease the comparison with other approaches on a common data set. See https://github.com/aboucaud/coindeblend.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Boucaud et al. (2020) showed that measured photometry of pairs of galaxies is improved with respect to the standard SEXTRACTOR based approach using a Unet.
“In this proof-of-concept work, it is shown that the measured photometry of pairs of galaxies is improved with respect to the standard SEXTRACTOR based approach”
From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Boucaud et al. (2020)
Boucaud et al. (2020) tested their method in an idealised setting where the stamps only contained two images with one galaxy at the centre.
“However, this was tested in an idealised setting where the stamps only contained two images with one galaxy at the centre.”
From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Boucaud et al. (2020)
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404 · see citing works
Efficient Processing of Deep Neural Networks: A Tutorial and Survey
Sze, V., Chen, Y.-H., Yang, T.-J., & Emer, J. S. (2017) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2017.2761740 · Cited by 4,215 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sze et al. 2017) to directly compute the fluxes of the two galaxies from the blend image.”
BackgroundPractical Recommendations for Gradient-Based Training of Deep Architectures
Bengio, Y. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_26 · Cited by 2,259 · see citing works
Schawinski, K., Zhang, C., Zhang, H., Fowler, L., & Santhanam, G. K. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx008 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
The many flavours of photometric redshifts
Salvato, M., Ilbert, O., & Hoyle, B. (2018) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0478-0 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
CMU DeepLens: deep learning for automatic image-based galaxy–galaxy strong lens finding
Lanusse, F., Ma, Q., Li, N., Collett, T. E., Li, C.-L., Ravanbakhsh, S., Mandelbaum, R., & Póczos, B. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1665 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Morpheus: A Deep Learning Framework for the Pixel-level Analysis of Astronomical Image Data
Hausen, R., & Robertson, B. E. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab8868 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“Deep learning models have been further applied to infer the surface brightness profiles of galaxies (Tuccillo et al. 2018) and measure their fluxes (Boucaud et al. 2019), and now to simulate entire surveys (Smith & Geach 2019).”
MethodThe Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys
Huertas-Company, M., & Lanusse, F. (2023) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.55 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Quantifying Non-parametric Structure of High-redshift Galaxies with Deep Learning
Tohill, C., Ferreira, L., Conselice, C. J., Bamford, S. P., & Ferrari, F. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac033c · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The challenge of blending in large sky surveys
Melchior, P., Joseph, R., Sanchez, J., MacCrann, N., & Gruen, D. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00353-y · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Boucaud, A., Huertas-Company, M., Heneka, C., Ishida, E. E. O., Sedaghat, N., de Souza, R. S., Moews, B., Dole, H., Castellano, M., Merlin, E., Roscani, V., Tramacere, A., Killedar, M., Trindade, A. M. M., & Collaboration for the COIN
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), E-38200, La Laguna, Spain
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, USA
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400 Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Sud (FR)
- Astronomical Observatory of Rome (IT)
- University of Geneva (CH)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Boucaud, Alexandre
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-12-02
- Volume
- 491
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2481-2495
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2953475150
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- NASA (14-ATP14-0007)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
- Keywords
- galaxy blending, photometry, deep neural network, high-redshift galaxies, CANDELS, segmentation maps, photometric surveys
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review