The PAU Survey: background light estimation with deep learning techniques
Open accessAbstract
In any imaging survey, measuring accurately the astronomical background light is crucial to obtain good photometry. This paper introduces BKGnet, a deep neural network to predict the background and its associated error. BKGnet has been developed for data from the Physics of the Accelerating Universe Survey (PAUS), an imaging survey using a 40 narrow-band filter camera (PAUCam). The images obtained with PAUCam are affected by scattered light: an optical effect consisting of light multiply reflected that deposits energy in specific detector regions affecting the science measurements. Fortunately, scattered light is not a random effect, but it can be predicted and corrected for. We have found that BKGnet background predictions are very robust to distorting effects, while still being statistically accurate. On average, the use of BKGnet improves the photometric flux measurements by $7{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ and up to $20{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ at the bright end. BKGnet also removes a systematic trend in the background error estimation with magnitude in the i band that is present with the current PAU data management method. With BKGnet, we reduce the photometric redshift outlier rate by $35{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ for the best $20{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ galaxies selected with a photometric quality parameter.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cabayol-Garcia et al. (2020) and Cabayol et al. (2021) find that the deep learning approach improves the photometric accuracy by up to ~40%.
“They find in this case that the deep learning approach improves the photometric accuracy by up to ∼ 40%.”
From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Cabayol-Garcia et al. (2020)
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Cosmological constraints from noisy convergence maps through deep learning
Fluri, J., Kacprzak, T., Refregier, A., Amara, A., Lucchi, A., & Hofmann, T. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.123518 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys
Huertas-Company, M., & Lanusse, F. (2023) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.55 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cabayol-Garcia, L., Eriksen, M., Alarcón, A., Amara, A., Carretero, J., Casas, R., Castander, F. J., Fernández, E., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Hoekstra, H., Miquel, R., Neissner, C., Padilla, C., Sánchez, E., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Siudek, M., Tallada, P., & Tortorelli, L.
- Affiliations
- Institute for High Energy Physics (ES)
- Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- Institute of Space Sciences (ES)
- Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
- Instituto de Física Teórica (ES)
- Leiden University (NL)
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), E-28040 Madrid, Spain
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Cabayol-Garcia, L
- Eriksen, M
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-11-23
- Volume
- 491
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 5392-5405
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2991073580
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Funders
- Nvidia
- Centres de Recerca de Catalunya
- European Commission (HORIZON2020, 776247)
- Generalitat de Catalunya
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (639.043.512)
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
- Institut de Física d'Altes Energies
- European Regional Development Fund (SEV-2016-0588, MDM-2015-0509, SEV-2016-0597, 776247)
- Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (MDM-2015-0509)
- Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation
- Integrated Electronics Engineering Center, Binghamton University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
- Keywords
- background light estimation, scatter correction, deep neural network, narrow-band imaging, photometry, galaxy photometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review