Integrating Phylogenetics With Intron Positions Illuminates the Origin of the Complex Spliceosome
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Eukaryotic genes are characterized by the presence of introns that are removed from pre-mRNA by a spliceosome. This ribonucleoprotein complex is comprised of multiple RNA molecules and over a hundred proteins, which makes it one of the most complex molecular machines that originated during the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition. Previous works have established that these introns and the spliceosomal core originated from self-splicing introns in prokaryotes. Yet, how the spliceosomal core expanded by recruiting many additional proteins remains largely elusive. In this study, we use phylogenetic analyses to infer the evolutionary history of 145 proteins that we could trace back to the spliceosome in the last eukaryotic common ancestor. We found that an overabundance of proteins derived from ribosome-related processes was added to the prokaryote-derived core. Extensive duplications of these proteins substantially increased the complexity of the emerging spliceosome. By comparing the intron positions between spliceosomal paralogs, we infer that most spliceosomal complexity postdates the spread of introns through the proto-eukaryotic genome. The reconstruction of early spliceosomal evolution provides insight into the driving forces behind the emergence of complexes with many proteins during eukaryogenesis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
seaborn: statistical data visualization
Waskom, M. (2021) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.03021 · Cited by 7,310 · see citing works
Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity
Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, K., Caceres, E. F., Saw, J. H., Bäckström, D., Juzokaite, L., Vancaester, E., Seitz, K. W., Anantharaman, K., Starnawski, P., Kjeldsen, K. U., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21031 · Cited by 1,226 · see citing works
Comparative Genomics, Evolution and Origins of the Nuclear Envelope and Nuclear Pore Complex
Mans, B., Anantharaman, V., Aravind, L., & Koonin, E. V. (2004) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.3.12.1316 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Reciprocal best structure hits: using AlphaFold models to discover distant homologues
Monzon, V., Paysan-Lafosse, T., Wood, V., & Bateman, A. (2022) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbac072 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Vosseberg, J., Stolker, D., von der Dunk, S. H. A., & Snel, B.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University , 3584 CH Utrecht , the Netherlands
- Corresponding author
- Snel, Berend
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-01-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- PMC
- PMC9887622
- OpenAlex
- W4315754074
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.160.638)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- spliceosome evolution, introns, eukaryotic origin, last eukaryotic common ancestor, spliceosomal proteins, gene duplication, intron positions, self-splicing introns, phylogenetic inference
- MeSH terms
- Introns, Phylogeny, RNA Splicing, Spliceosomes, Evolution, Molecular, Eukaryota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review