The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Phylogeny of the Plant Pathogenic Genus Botrytis and the Evolution of Host Specificity
Open accessAbstract
The cosmopolitan genus Botrytis contains 22 recognized species and one hybrid. The current classification is largely based on morphological characters and, to a minor extent, on physiology and host range. In this study, a classification of the genus was constructed based on DNA sequence data of three nuclear protein-coding genes (RPB2, G3PDH, and HSP60) and compared with the traditional classification. Sexual reproduction and the host range, important fitness traits, were traced in the tree and used for the identification of major evolutionary events during speciation. The phylogenetic analysis corroborated the classical species delineation. In addition, the hybrid status of B. allii (B. byssoidea x B. aclada) was confirmed. Both individual gene trees and combined trees show that the genus Botrytis can be divided into two clades, radiating after the separation of Botrytis from other Sclerotiniaceae genera. Clade 1 contains four species that all colonize exclusively eudicot hosts, whereas clade 2 contains 18 species that are pathogenic on either eudicot (3) or monocot (15) hosts. A comparison of Botrytis and angiosperm phylogenies shows that cospeciation of pathogens and their hosts have not occurred during their respective evolution. Rather, we propose that host shifts have occurred during Botrytis speciation, possibly by the acquisition of novel pathogenicity factors. Loss of sexual reproduction has occurred at least three times and is supposed to be a consequence of negative selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies.
Rokas, A., Williams, B. L., King, N., & Carroll, S. B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02053 · Cited by 1,512
Cited by
Diversity, Pathogenicity, and Management of Verticillium Species
Klosterman, S. J., Atallah, Z. K., Vallad, G. E., & Subbarao, K. V. (2009) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081748 · Cited by 774
Botrytis cinerea virulence factors: new insights into a necrotrophic and polyphageous pathogen
Choquer, M., Fournier, E., Kunz, C., Levis, C., Pradier, J.-M., Simon, A., & Viaud, M. (2007) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00930.x · Cited by 451
Panno, S., Davino, S., Caruso, A. G., Bertacca, S., Crnogorac, A., Mandić, A., Noris, E., & Matić, S. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11112188 · Cited by 382
Alkan, N., Meng, X., Friedlander, G., Reuveni, E., Sukno, S., Sherman, A., Thon, M., Fluhr, R., & Prusky, D. (2013) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-03-13-0080-r · Cited by 107
Vitamin E synthesis and response in plants
Niu, Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Li, Y., Wang, X., & Bao, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.994058 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Staats, M.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-10-13
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 333-346
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2147024765
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Phylogeny of the Plant Pathogenic Genus Botrytis and the Evolution of Host Specificity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/msi020
- The paper
- Staats, M. (2004). Molecular Phylogeny of the Plant Pathogenic Genus Botrytis and the Evolution of Host Specificity. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msi020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.