Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling Protein Evolution with Several Amino Acid Replacement Matrices Depending on Site Rates

Open access
Le, S. Q., Dang, C. C., Gascuel, O.·2012·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

Most protein substitution models use a single amino acid replacement matrix summarizing the biochemical properties of amino acids. However, site evolution is highly heterogeneous and depends on many factors that influence the substitution patterns. In this paper, we investigate the use of different substitution matrices for different site evolutionary rates. Indeed, the variability of evolutionary rates corresponds to one of the most apparent heterogeneity factors among sites, and there is no reason to assume that the substitution patterns remain identical regardless of the evolutionary rate. We first introduce LG4M, which is composed of four matrices, each corresponding to one discrete gamma rate category (of four). These matrices differ in their amino acid equilibrium distributions and in their exchangeabilities, contrary to the standard gamma model where only the global rate differs from one category to another. Next, we present LG4X, which also uses four different matrices, but leaves aside the gamma distribution and follows a distribution-free scheme for the site rates. All these matrices are estimated from a very large alignment database, and our two models are tested using a large sample of independent alignments. Detailed analysis of resulting matrices and models shows the complexity of amino acid substitutions and the advantage of flexible models such as LG4M and LG4X. Both significantly outperform single-matrix models, providing gains of dozens to hundreds of log-likelihood units for most data sets. LG4X obtains substantial gains compared with LG4M, thanks to its distribution-free scheme for site rates. Since LG4M and LG4X display such advantages but require the same memory space and have comparable running times to standard models, we believe that LG4M and LG4X are relevant alternatives to single replacement matrices. Our models, data, and software are available from http://www.atgc-montpellier.fr/models/lg4x.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/mss112

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 1974, IEEE TRANS AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 19, 716, 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Berman, 2000, Nucleic Acids Research, 28, 235, 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 1996, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 999, 10.1093/molbev/13.7.999 · DOI
  4. Castresana, 2000, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17, 540, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2002, J COMP BIOL, 19, 687
  6. Felsenstein, 1996, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 93, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025575 · DOI
  7. Gascuel, 1997, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 14, 685, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025808 · DOI
  8. 2008, Systematic Biology, 57, 814, 10.1080/10635150802422308 · DOI
  9. Holmes, 2002, Journal of molecular biology, 317, 753, 10.1006/jmbi.2002.5405 · DOI
  10. Jones, 1992, Bioinformatics, 8, 275, 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275 · DOI
  11. Jones, 1994, FEBS Letters, 339, 269, 10.1016/0014-5793(94)80429-X · DOI
  12. Keane, 2006, BMC evolutionary biology [electronic resource], 6, 29, 10.1186/1471-2148-6-29 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Kishino, 1989, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 29, 170, 10.1007/BF02100115 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Klosterman, 2006, BMC bioinformatics [electronic resource], 7, 428, 10.1186/1471-2105-7-428 · DOI
  15. 1995, Protein Engineering Design and Selection, 8, 641, 10.1093/protein/8.7.641 · DOI
  16. Koshi, 1998, Proteins, 32, 289, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19980815)32:3<289::AID-PROT4>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
  17. Kyte, 1982, Journal of molecular biology, 157, 105, 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2004, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21, 1095, 10.1093/molbev/msh112 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2008, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25, 1307, 10.1093/molbev/msn067 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 2010, Systematic Biology, 59, 277, 10.1093/sysbio/syq002 · DOI
  21. 2008, Bioinformatics, 24, 2317, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn445 · DOI
  22. Le, 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3965, 10.1098/rstb.2008.0180 · DOI
  23. Lio, 1998, Bioinformatics, 14, 726, 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.8.726 · DOI
  24. 2005, Bioinformatics, 21, 151, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1125 · DOI
  25. Olea-Azar, 2006, Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 63, 36, 10.1007/s00018-005-5350-6 · DOI
  26. 1979, LECT NOTES MATH, 748, 119, 10.1007/BFb0102690 · DOI
  27. 1994, American Journal of Botany, 81, 183
  28. 1997, Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 226, 10.1093/nar/25.1.226 · DOI
  29. 1997, 49, 395, 10.1023/A:1003140609666 · DOI
  30. 2003, Systematic Biology, 52, 594, 10.1080/10635150390235395 · DOI
  31. Thorne, 1996, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 666, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025627 · DOI
  32. Wang, 2008, BMC evolutionary biology [electronic resource], 8, 331, 10.1186/1471-2148-8-331 · DOI
  33. Yang, 1993, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10, 1396
  34. Yang, 1998, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15, 1600, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025888 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Le, S. Q., Dang, C. C., & Gascuel, O.
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2012-04-06
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
2921-2936
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W2100030044
Cited by
223
References
4
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.