The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Protein Evolution with Several Amino Acid Replacement Matrices Depending on Site Rates
Open accessAbstract
Most protein substitution models use a single amino acid replacement matrix summarizing the biochemical properties of amino acids. However, site evolution is highly heterogeneous and depends on many factors that influence the substitution patterns. In this paper, we investigate the use of different substitution matrices for different site evolutionary rates. Indeed, the variability of evolutionary rates corresponds to one of the most apparent heterogeneity factors among sites, and there is no reason to assume that the substitution patterns remain identical regardless of the evolutionary rate. We first introduce LG4M, which is composed of four matrices, each corresponding to one discrete gamma rate category (of four). These matrices differ in their amino acid equilibrium distributions and in their exchangeabilities, contrary to the standard gamma model where only the global rate differs from one category to another. Next, we present LG4X, which also uses four different matrices, but leaves aside the gamma distribution and follows a distribution-free scheme for the site rates. All these matrices are estimated from a very large alignment database, and our two models are tested using a large sample of independent alignments. Detailed analysis of resulting matrices and models shows the complexity of amino acid substitutions and the advantage of flexible models such as LG4M and LG4X. Both significantly outperform single-matrix models, providing gains of dozens to hundreds of log-likelihood units for most data sets. LG4X obtains substantial gains compared with LG4M, thanks to its distribution-free scheme for site rates. Since LG4M and LG4X display such advantages but require the same memory space and have comparable running times to standard models, we believe that LG4M and LG4X are relevant alternatives to single replacement matrices. Our models, data, and software are available from http://www.atgc-montpellier.fr/models/lg4x.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.-F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., & Gascuel, O. (2010) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq010 · Cited by 18,376
Self-citationEvolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Whelan, S., & Goldman, N. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003851 · Cited by 2,849
Assessing the Impact of Secondary Structure and Solvent Accessibility on Protein Evolution
Goldman, N., Thorne, J. L., & Jones, D. T. (1998) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/149.1.445 · Cited by 281
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 1974, IEEE TRANS AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 19, 716, 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 · DOI · Paper page
- Berman, 2000, Nucleic Acids Research, 28, 235, 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 1996, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 999, 10.1093/molbev/13.7.999 · DOI
- Castresana, 2000, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17, 540, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, J COMP BIOL, 19, 687
- Felsenstein, 1996, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 93, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025575 · DOI
- Gascuel, 1997, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 14, 685, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025808 · DOI
- 2008, Systematic Biology, 57, 814, 10.1080/10635150802422308 · DOI
- Holmes, 2002, Journal of molecular biology, 317, 753, 10.1006/jmbi.2002.5405 · DOI
- Jones, 1992, Bioinformatics, 8, 275, 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275 · DOI
- Jones, 1994, FEBS Letters, 339, 269, 10.1016/0014-5793(94)80429-X · DOI
- Keane, 2006, BMC evolutionary biology [electronic resource], 6, 29, 10.1186/1471-2148-6-29 · DOI · Paper page
- Kishino, 1989, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 29, 170, 10.1007/BF02100115 · DOI · Paper page
- Klosterman, 2006, BMC bioinformatics [electronic resource], 7, 428, 10.1186/1471-2105-7-428 · DOI
- 1995, Protein Engineering Design and Selection, 8, 641, 10.1093/protein/8.7.641 · DOI
- Koshi, 1998, Proteins, 32, 289, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19980815)32:3<289::AID-PROT4>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
- Kyte, 1982, Journal of molecular biology, 157, 105, 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21, 1095, 10.1093/molbev/msh112 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25, 1307, 10.1093/molbev/msn067 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, Systematic Biology, 59, 277, 10.1093/sysbio/syq002 · DOI
- 2008, Bioinformatics, 24, 2317, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn445 · DOI
- Le, 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3965, 10.1098/rstb.2008.0180 · DOI
- Lio, 1998, Bioinformatics, 14, 726, 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.8.726 · DOI
- 2005, Bioinformatics, 21, 151, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1125 · DOI
- Olea-Azar, 2006, Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 63, 36, 10.1007/s00018-005-5350-6 · DOI
- 1979, LECT NOTES MATH, 748, 119, 10.1007/BFb0102690 · DOI
- 1994, American Journal of Botany, 81, 183
- 1997, Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 226, 10.1093/nar/25.1.226 · DOI
- 1997, 49, 395, 10.1023/A:1003140609666 · DOI
- 2003, Systematic Biology, 52, 594, 10.1080/10635150390235395 · DOI
- Thorne, 1996, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 666, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025627 · DOI
- Wang, 2008, BMC evolutionary biology [electronic resource], 8, 331, 10.1186/1471-2148-8-331 · DOI
- Yang, 1993, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10, 1396
- Yang, 1998, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15, 1600, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025888 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies
Stamatakis, A. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 · Cited by 32,291
IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era
Minh, B. Q., Schmidt, H. A., Chernomor, O., Schrempf, D., Woodhams, M. D., von Haeseler, A., & Lanfear, R. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · Cited by 16,873
Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science
Lähnemann, D., Köster, J., Szczurek, E., McCarthy, D. J., Hicks, S. C., Robinson, M. D., Vallejos, C. A., Campbell, K. R., Beerenwinkel, N., Mahfouz, A., et al. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-1926-6 · Cited by 1,327
Phylogenetic tree building in the genomic age
Kapli, P., Yang, Z., & Telford, M. J. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0233-0 · Cited by 533
Wang, H.-C., Minh, B. Q., Susko, E., & Roger, A. J. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syx068 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Le, S. Q., Dang, C. C., & Gascuel, O.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-04-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2921-2936
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2100030044
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.