Cited by 103Evolution and Genetic DynamicsGenetic diversity and population structurePrimate Behavior and Ecology

Nocturnal light environments influence color vision and signatures of selection on the OPN1SW opsin gene in nocturnal lemurs

Veilleux, Carrie C., Louis, Edward E., Bolnick, Deborah A.·2013·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

Although loss of short-wavelength-sensitive (SWS) cones and dichromatic color vision in mammals has traditionally been linked to a nocturnal lifestyle, recent studies have identified variation in selective pressure for the maintenance of the OPN1SW opsin gene (and thus, potentially dichromacy) among nocturnal mammalian lineages. These studies hypothesize that purifying selection to retain SWS cones may be associated with a selective advantage for nocturnal color vision under certain ecological conditions. In this study, we explore the effect of nocturnal light environment on OPN1SW opsin gene evolution in a diverse sample of nocturnal lemurs (106 individuals, 19 species, and 5 genera). Using both phylogenetic and population genetic approaches, we test whether species from closed canopy rainforests, which are impoverished in short-wavelength light, have experienced relaxed selection compared with species from open canopy forests. We identify clear signatures of differential selection on OPN1SW by habitat type. Our results suggest that open canopy species generally experience strong purifying selection to maintain SWS cones. In contrast, closed canopy species experience weaker purifying selection or a relaxation of selection on OPN1SW. We also found evidence of nonfunctional OPN1SW genes in all Phaner species and in Cheirogaleus medius, implying at least three independent losses of SWS cones in cheirogaleids. Our results suggest that the evolution of color vision in nocturnal l…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/mst058

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The importance of color vision is likely reduced in nocturnal animals.

    “Correspondingly, the importance of color vision is likely reduced in nocturnal animals (Zhao, Rossiter, et al. 2009;Veilleux et al. 2013).”

    From RELAX: Detecting Relaxed Selection in a Phylogenetic Framework (2015) · cites this paper as Veilleux et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Veilleux, C. C., Louis, E. E., & Bolnick, D. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Veilleux, Carrie C.
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2013-03-21
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1420-1437
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W2137559711
Cited by
103
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
dichromatic color vision, relaxed selection, purifying selection, open-canopy forests, Cheirogaleus medius, color vision evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Environment, Genetics, Population, Humans, Lemur, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Selection, Genetic, Sequence Alignment, Rod Opsins, Evolution, Molecular, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Color Vision, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review