Cited by 108Evolution and Paleontology StudiesGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology

Genomic support for a moa-tinamou clade and adaptive morphological convergence in flightless ratites

Baker, Allan J., Haddrath, Oliver, McPherson, John D., Cloutier, Alison·2014·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

One of the most startling discoveries in avian molecular phylogenetics is that the volant tinamous are embedded in the flightless ratites, but this topology remains controversial because recent morphological phylogenies place tinamous as the closest relative of a monophyletic ratite clade. Here, we integrate new phylogenomic sequences from 1,448 nuclear DNA loci totaling almost 1 million bp from the extinct little bush moa, Chilean tinamou, and emu with available sequences from ostrich, elegant crested tinamou, four neognaths, and the green anole. Phylogenetic analysis using standard homogeneous models and heterogeneous models robust to common topological artifacts recovered compelling support for ratite paraphyly with the little bush moa closest to tinamous within ratites. Ratite paraphyly was further corroborated by eight independent CR1 retroposon insertions. Analysis of morphological characters reinterpreted on a 27-gene paleognath topology indicates that many characters are convergent in the ratites, probably as the result of adaptation to a cursorial life style.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msu153

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent phylogenetic work supports the conclusion that the ratites are paraphyletic, implying convergent loss of flight in these lineages.

    “Recent phylogenetic work supports the conclusion that the ratites (including ostrich, emu, cassowaries, kiwis, rheas, and the extinct moas and elephant bird) are paraphyletic, implying convergent loss of flight in these lineages”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, A. J., Haddrath, O., McPherson, J. D., & Cloutier, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Royal Ontario Museum (CA)
  • Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA)
Corresponding author
Baker, Allan J.
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2014-05-13
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
1686-1696
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W2041791014
Cited by
108
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
moa, tinamous, ratites, flightless birds, avian phylogeny, emu, morphological convergence, cursorial adaptations
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Likelihood Functions, Genome, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Evolution, Molecular, Palaeognathae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review