Genomic support for a moa-tinamou clade and adaptive morphological convergence in flightless ratites
Abstract
One of the most startling discoveries in avian molecular phylogenetics is that the volant tinamous are embedded in the flightless ratites, but this topology remains controversial because recent morphological phylogenies place tinamous as the closest relative of a monophyletic ratite clade. Here, we integrate new phylogenomic sequences from 1,448 nuclear DNA loci totaling almost 1 million bp from the extinct little bush moa, Chilean tinamou, and emu with available sequences from ostrich, elegant crested tinamou, four neognaths, and the green anole. Phylogenetic analysis using standard homogeneous models and heterogeneous models robust to common topological artifacts recovered compelling support for ratite paraphyly with the little bush moa closest to tinamous within ratites. Ratite paraphyly was further corroborated by eight independent CR1 retroposon insertions. Analysis of morphological characters reinterpreted on a 27-gene paleognath topology indicates that many characters are convergent in the ratites, probably as the result of adaptation to a cursorial life style.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent phylogenetic work supports the conclusion that the ratites are paraphyletic, implying convergent loss of flight in these lineages.
“Recent phylogenetic work supports the conclusion that the ratites (including ostrich, emu, cassowaries, kiwis, rheas, and the extinct moas and elephant bird) are paraphyletic, implying convergent loss of flight in these lineages”
From Bayesian Detection of Convergent Rate Changes of Conserved Noncoding Elements on Phylogenetic Trees (2019) · cites this paper as Baker et al. 2014
Cites
Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: Why more sequences are not enough
Philippe, H., Brinkmann, H., Lavrov, D. V., Littlewood, D. T. J., Manuel, M., Wörheide, G., & Baurain, D. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000602 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
Lartillot, N., Rodrigue, N., Stubbs, D., & Richer, J. (2013) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syt022 · Cited by 871 · see citing works
Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H., & Philippe, H. (2007) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-s1-s4 · Cited by 705 · see citing works
Phylogenomics: The beginning of incongruence?
JEFFROY, O., BRINKMANN, H., DELSUC, F., & PHILIPPE, H. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2006.02.003 · Cited by 698 · see citing works
LIVEZEY, B. C., & ZUSI, R. L. (2007) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00293.x · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Modeling compositional heterogeneity
Foster, P. G. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490445779 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bayesian Detection of Convergent Rate Changes of Conserved Noncoding Elements on Phylogenetic Trees
Hu, Z., Sackton, T. B., Edwards, S. V., & Liu, J. S. (2019) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msz049 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baker, A. J., Haddrath, O., McPherson, J. D., & Cloutier, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Royal Ontario Museum (CA)
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Baker, Allan J.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-05-13
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1686-1696
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2041791014
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Keywords
- moa, tinamous, ratites, flightless birds, avian phylogeny, emu, morphological convergence, cursorial adaptations
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Likelihood Functions, Genome, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Evolution, Molecular, Palaeognathae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review