The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unguided Species Delimitation Using DNA Sequence Data from Multiple Loci
Open accessAbstract
A method was developed for simultaneous Bayesian inference of species delimitation and species phylogeny using the multispecies coalescent model. The method eliminates the need for a user-specified guide tree in species delimitation and incorporates phylogenetic uncertainty in a Bayesian framework. The nearest-neighbor interchange algorithm was adapted to propose changes to the species tree, with the gene trees for multiple loci altered in the proposal to avoid conflicts with the newly proposed species tree. We also modify our previous scheme for specifying priors for species delimitation models to construct joint priors for models of species delimitation and species phylogeny. As in our earlier method, the modified algorithm integrates over gene trees, taking account of the uncertainty of gene tree topology and branch lengths given the sequence data. We conducted a simulation study to examine the statistical properties of the method using six populations (two sequences each) and a true number of three species, with values of divergence times and ancestral population sizes that are realistic for recently diverged species. The results suggest that the method tends to be conservative with high posterior probabilities being a confident indicator of species status. Simulation results also indicate that the power of the method to delimit species increases with an increase of the divergence times in the species tree, and with an increased number of gene loci. Reanalyses of two data sets of cavefish and coast horned lizards suggest considerable phylogenetic uncertainty even though the data are informative about species delimitation. We discuss the impact of the prior on models of species delimitation and species phylogeny and of the prior on population size parameters (θ) on Bayesian species delimitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data
Yang, Z., & Rannala, B. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913022107 · Cited by 1,405
Self-citation
Cited by
The BPP program for species tree estimation and species delimitation
Yang, Z. (2015) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/czoolo/61.5.854 · Cited by 772
Self-citationMallet, J., Besansky, N., & Hahn, M. W. (2016) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201500149 · Cited by 586
Cryptic species as a window into the paradigm shift of the species concept
Fišer, C., Robinson, C. T., & Malard, F. (2018) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14486 · Cited by 574
Phylogenetic tree building in the genomic age
Kapli, P., Yang, Z., & Telford, M. J. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0233-0 · Cited by 533
Self-citationStarBEAST2 brings faster species tree inference and accurate estimates of substitution rates
Ogilvie, H. A., Bouckaert, R. R., & Drummond, A. J. (2017) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msx126 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Z., & Rannala, B.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-10-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3125-3135
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2015929993
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unguided Species Delimitation Using DNA Sequence Data from Multiple Loci. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/msu279
- The paper
- Yang, Z., & Rannala, B. (2014). Unguided Species Delimitation Using DNA Sequence Data from Multiple Loci. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.