Cited by 90Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFish Biology and Ecology StudiesGenetic diversity and population structure

Phylogeny of Zebrafish, a “Model Species,” within Danio, a “Model Genus”

Open access
McCluskey, Braedan M., Postlethwait, John H.·2015·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) is an important model for vertebrate development, genomics, physiology, behavior, toxicology, and disease. Additionally, work on numerous Danio species is elucidating evolutionary mechanisms for morphological development. Yet, the relationships of zebrafish and its closest relatives remain unclear possibly due to incomplete lineage sorting, speciation with gene flow, and interspecies hybridization. To clarify these relationships, we first constructed phylogenomic data sets from 30,801 restriction-associated DNA (RAD)-tag loci (483,026 variable positions) with clear orthology to a single location in the sequenced zebrafish genome. We then inferred a well-supported species tree for Danio and tested for gene flow during the diversification of the genus. An approach independent of the sequenced zebrafish genome verified all inferred relationships. Although identification of the sister taxon to zebrafish has been contentious, multiple RAD-tag data sets and several analytical methods provided strong evidence for Danio aesculapii as the most closely related extant zebrafish relative studied to date. Data also displayed patterns consistent with gene flow during speciation and postspeciation introgression in the lineage leading to zebrafish. The incorporation of biogeographic data with phylogenomic analyses put these relationships in a phylogeographic context and supplied additional support for D. aesculapii as the sister species to D. rerio. The clear resolution of this study establishes a framework for investigating the evolutionary biology of Danio and the heterogeneity of genome evolution in the recent history of a model organism within an emerging model genus for genetics, development, and evolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msu325

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The difficulty finding a single, unambiguous phylogeny for this group is consistent with a complex evolutionary history of the Rerio clade involving a hybrid origin of D. rerio, high rates of incomplete lineage sorting, and speciation with gene flow.

    “The difficulty finding a single, unambiguous phylogeny for this group is consistent with a complex evolutionary history of the Rerio clade involving a hybrid origin of D. rerio, high rates of incomplete lineage sorting, and speciation with gene flow as suggested previously2,31.”

    From Genomic and genetic insights into speciation and pigment pattern diversification in <i>Danio</i> fishes (2025) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Conclusions and Multilocus Phylogeny sections describe multiple gene-tree topologies and a complex history involving rapid speciation and introgression. The introgression tests report gene flow involving the D. rerio lineage after it diverged from D. aesculapii, but do not establish a hybrid origin for D. rerio. The Multilocus Phylogeny section says it remains unclear how often incomplete lineage sorting explains the differing topologies, so it does not support the claim of high rates. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Engeszer RE, Patterson LB, Rao AA, Parichy DM. 2007. Zebrafish in the wild: a review of natural history and new notes from the field. Zebrafish 4:21-38.
  2. Fang F. 2000. A review of Chinese Danio species (Teleostei:Cyprinidae). Acta Zootaxon Sin. 25:213-227.
  3. Sen N, Dey SC. 1985. Two new fish species of the genus Danio Hamilton (Pisces: Cyprinidae) from Meghalaya, India. Journal Assam Scientific Society 27:60-68.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCluskey, B. M., & Postlethwait, J. H.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Postlethwait, John H.
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2014-11-20
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
635-652
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W1981151826
Cited by
90
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01OD011116)
  • National Center for Research Resources (R01RR020833)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 22486, P01HD022486)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
zebrafish, species tree, gene flow, introgression, incomplete lineage sorting, sister species, phylogeography, biogeography, genome evolution, model organisms
MeSH terms
Animals, Phylogeny, Zebrafish, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review