“Reverse genomics” predicts function of human conserved noncoding elements
Open accessAbstract
Evolutionary changes in cis-regulatory elements are thought to play a key role in morphological and physiological diversity across animals. Many conserved noncoding elements (CNEs) function as cis-regulatory elements, controlling gene expression levels in different biological contexts. However, determining specific associations between CNEs and related phenotypes is a challenging task. Here, we present a computational "reverse genomics" approach that predicts the phenotypic functions of human CNEs. We identify thousands of human CNEs that were lost in at least two independent mammalian lineages (IL-CNEs), and match their evolutionary profiles against a diverse set of phenotypes recently annotated across multiple mammalian species. We identify 2,759 compelling associations between human CNEs and a diverse set of mammalian phenotypes. We discuss multiple CNEs, including a predicted ear element near BMP7, a pelvic CNE in FBN1, a brain morphology element in UBE4B, and an aquatic adaptation forelimb CNE near EGR2, and provide a full list of our predictions. As more genomes are sequenced and more traits are annotated across species, we expect our method to facilitate the interpretation of noncoding mutations in human disease and expedite the discovery of individual CNEs that play key roles in human evolution and development.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Marcovitz et al. (2016) used parsimony to reconstruct traits and genome transitions and estimate their correlations, but were unable to account for the uncertainty of conservation pattern estimated from the sequencing data or the probability of a chance match between sequence evolutionary history and phenotype.
“For example, Marcovitz et al. (2016) used parsimony to reconstruct traits and genome transitions and estimate their correlations, but in doing so were unable to account for the uncertainty of conservation pattern estimated from the sequencing data or the probability of a chance match between sequence evolutionary history and phenotype.”
From Bayesian Detection of Convergent Rate Changes of Conserved Noncoding Elements on Phylogenetic Trees (2019) · cites this paper as Marcovitz et al. 2016
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes
Siepel, A., Bejerano, G., Pedersen, J. S., Hinrichs, A. S., Hou, M., Rosenbloom, K., Clawson, H., Spieth, J., Hillier, L. W., Richards, S., et al. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3715005 · Cited by 4,408 · cited 4× · see citing works
“We started with a set of human elements at least 50 bp in length that are highly conserved across mammals (Siepel et al. 2005), excluding all protein-coding or other known or predicted transcribed regions (see Materials and Methods).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationThe evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations
Wray, G. A. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2063 · Cited by 1,521 · see citing works
Evolution at Two Levels: On Genes and Form
Carroll, S. B. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030245 · Cited by 882 · see citing works
Human-specific loss of regulatory DNA and the evolution of human-specific traits
McLean, C. Y., Reno, P. L., Pollen, A. A., Bassan, A. I., Capellini, T. D., Guenther, C., Indjeian, V. B., Lim, X., Menke, D. B., Schaar, B. T., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09774 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Self-citationThe evolution of combinatorial gene regulation in fungi
Tuch, B. B., Galgoczy, D. J., Hernday, A. D., Li, H., & Johnson, A. D. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060038 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Siepel A, Haussler D. 2004. Computational identification of evolution- arily conserved exons. In: Gusfield D, Bourne P, Istrail S, Pevzner P, Waterman M, editors. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology. RECOMB '04. New York: ACM. p. 177-186. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/974614.974638. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bayesian Detection of Convergent Rate Changes of Conserved Noncoding Elements on Phylogenetic Trees
Hu, Z., Sackton, T. B., Edwards, S. V., & Liu, J. S. (2019) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msz049 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Fukushima, K., & Pollock, D. D. (2023) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-022-01932-7 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Marcovitz, A., Jia, R., & Bejerano, G.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bejerano, Gill
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-01-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1358-1369
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- PMC
- PMC4909134
- OpenAlex
- W2230069903
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- David and Lucile Packard Foundation
- Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales
- National Institutes of Health (DGE-114747)
- Center for Computational, Evolutionary and Human Genomics, Stanford University
- National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH105949)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- conserved non-coding elements, cis-regulatory elements, human evolution, non-coding mutations, BMP-7, fibrillin-1, UBE4B, EGR2, ear development, pelvic development, brain structure, aquatic adaptation, forelimb development, gene expression regulation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Biological Evolution, Genes, Regulator, Humans, Mammals, Phylogeny, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Conserved Sequence, Evolution, Molecular, DNA, Intergenic, RNA, Untranslated, Databases, Nucleic Acid, Genetic Association Studies, Reverse Genetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review