Cited by 145Genetic Syndromes and ImprintingGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Genomic imprinting: potential function and mechanisms revealed by the Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes

Glenn, C.·1997·Molecular Human Reproduction

Abstract

The Prader-Willi (PWS) and Angelman (AS) syndromes are two clinically distinct syndromes which result from lack of expression of imprinted genes within chromosome 15q11-q13. These two syndromes result from 15q11-q13 deletions, chromosome 15 uniparental disomy (UPD), imprinting centre mutations and, for AS, probable mutations in a single gene. The differential phenotype results from a paternal genetic deficiency in PWS patients and a maternal genetic deficiency in AS patients. Within 15q11-q13, four genes (SNRPN, IPW, ZNF127, FNZ127) and two expressed sequence tags (PAR1 and PAR5) have been found to be expressed only from the paternally inherited chromosome, and therefore all must be considered candidate genes involved in the pathogenesis of PWS. A candidate AS gene (UBE3A) has very recently been identified. The mechanisms of imprinted gene expression are not yet understood, but it is clear that DNA methylation is involved in both somatic cell expression and inheritance of the imprint. The presence of DNA methylation imprints that distinguish the paternally and maternally inherited alleles is a common characteristic of all known imprinted genes which have been studied extensively, including SNRPN and ZNF127. Recently, several PWS and AS patients have been found that have microdeletions in a region upstream of the SNRPN gene referred to as the imprinting centre, or IC. Paternal IC deletions in PWS patients and maternal IC deletions in AS patients result in uniparental DNA methylation and uniparental gene expression at biparentally inherited loci. The IC is a novel genetic element which controls initial resetting of the parental imprint in the germline for all imprinted gene expression over a 1.5-2.5 Mb region within chromosome 15q11-q13.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molehr/3.4.321

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 145

Authors
Glenn, C.
Affiliations
University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Glenn, C.
Venue
Molecular Human Reproduction
Published
1997-04-01
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
321-332
ISSN
  • 1360-9947 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2407
OpenAlex
W2154032366
Cited by
145
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD31491, R01HD031491)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
genomic imprinting, Prader-Willi syndrome, Angelman syndrome, chromosome 15q11-q13, DNA methylation, uniparental disomy, 15q11-q13 deletion, SNRPN, UBE3A
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromosome Deletion, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15, Female, Humans, Male, Mutation, Paternity, Phenotype, Prader-Willi Syndrome, Gene Expression, Angelman Syndrome, Genomic Imprinting, DNA Methylation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review