Cited by 43Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Genetic burden associated with varying degrees of disease severity in endometriosis

Open access
Sapkota, Yadav, Attia, John, Gordon, Scott D., Henders, Anjali K., Holliday, Elizabeth G., Rahmioglu, Nilufer, MacGregor, Stuart, Martin, Nicholas G. +6 more·2015·Molecular Human Reproduction

Abstract

Endometriosis is primarily characterized by the presence of tissue resembling endometrium outside the uterine cavity and is usually diagnosed by laparoscopy. The most commonly used classification of disease, the revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) system to grade endometriosis into different stages based on disease severity (I to IV), has been questioned as it does not correlate well with underlying symptoms, posing issues in diagnosis and choice of treatment. Using two independent European genome-wide association (GWA) datasets and top-level classification of the endometriosis cases based on rAFS [minimal or mild (Stage A) and moderate-to-severe (Stage B) disease], we previously showed that Stage B endometriosis has greater contribution of common genetic variation to its aetiology than Stage A disease. Herein, we extend our previous analysis to four endometriosis stages [minimal (Stage I), mild (Stage II), moderate (Stage III) and severe (Stage IV) disease] based on the rAFS classification system and compared the genetic burden across stages. Our results indicate that genetic burden increases from minimal to severe endometriosis. For the minimal disease, genetic factors may contribute to a lesser extent than other disease categories. Mild and moderate endometriosis appeared genetically similar, making it difficult to tease them apart. Consistent with our previous reports, moderate and severe endometriosis showed greater genetic burden than minimal or mild disease. Overall, our results provide new insights into the genetic architecture of endometriosis and further investigation in larger samples may help to understand better the aetiology of varying degrees of endometriosis, enabling improved diagnostic and treatment modalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molehr/gav021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 43

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tuttlies F, Keckstein J, Ulrich U, Possover M, Schweppe KW, Wustlich M, Buchweitz O, Greb R, Kandolf O, Mangold R et al. [ENZIAN-score, a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis]. Zentralbl. Gynakol. 2005; 127:275-281.

Authors
Sapkota, Y., Attia, J., Gordon, S. D., Henders, A. K., Holliday, E. G., Rahmioglu, N., MacGregor, S., Martin, N. G., McEvoy, M., Morris, A. P., Scott, R. J., Zondervan, K. T., Montgomery, G. W., & Nyholt, D. R.
Affiliations
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Sapkota, Yadav
Venue
Molecular Human Reproduction
Published
2015-04-16
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
594-602
ISSN
  • 1360-9947 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2407
OpenAlex
W2122501446
Cited by
43
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (241944, 339462, 389927, 389875, 389891, 389892, 389938, 443036, 442915, 442981, 496610, 496739, 552485, 552498)
  • Cooperative Research Centre for Discovery of Genes for Common Human Diseases (CRC)
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Funding for the WTCCC (076113, 085475)
  • NHMRC Fellowship (339462, 613674)
  • ARC Future Fellowship (FT0991022, 631096, 339446, 619667)
  • NHMRC Fellowships Scheme
  • University of Newcastle
  • Gladys M Brawn Fellowship scheme
  • the Vincent Fairfax Family Foundation in Australia.
  • Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship
  • Wellcome Trust Research Career Development Fellowship (WT085235/Z/08/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, disease severity, genetic burden, genetic architecture, common genetic variants, endometriosis stage, genome-wide association study
MeSH terms
Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review