The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay
Open accessAbstract
The in vivo alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay, hereafter the Comet assay, can be used to investigate the genotoxicity of industrial chemicals, biocides, agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals. The major advantages of this assay include the relative ease of application to any tissue of interest, the detection of multiple classes of DNA damage and the generation of data at the level of the single cell. These features give the Comet assay potential advantages over other in vivo test methods, which are limited largely to proliferating cells and/or a single tissue. The Comet assay has demonstrated its reliability in many testing circumstances and is, in general, considered to be acceptable for regulatory purposes. However, despite the considerable data published on the in vivo Comet assay and the general agreement within the international scientific community over many protocol-related issues, it was felt that a document giving detailed practical guidance on the protocol required for regulatory acceptance of the assay was required. In a recent meeting held in conjunction with the 4th International Comet Assay Workshop (Ulm, Germany, 22-25 July 2001) an expert panel reviewed existing data and recent developments of the Comet assay with a view to developing such a document. This paper is intended to act as an update to the more general guidelines which were published as a result of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures. The recommendations are also seen as a major step towards gaining more formal regulatory acceptance of the Comet assay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair: Principles, Applications, and Limitations
Collins, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/mb:26:3:249 · Cited by 2,892
Reeves, J. F., Davies, S. J., Dodd, N. J. F., & Jha, A. N. (2008) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.12.010 · Cited by 441
Statistical issues in the use of the comet assay
Lovell, D. P., & Omori, T. (2008) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gen015 · Cited by 297
Thirdhand smoke causes DNA damage in human cells
Hang, B., Sarker, A. H., Havel, C., Saha, S., Hazra, T. K., Schick, S., Jacob, P., Rehan, V. K., Chenna, A., Sharan, D., et al. (2013) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/get013 · Cited by 171
Peťková, M., Švubová, R., Kyzek, S., Medvecká, V., Slováková, Ľ., Ševčovičová, A., & Gálová, E. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22062833 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartmann, A.
- Venue
- Mutagenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-51
- ISSN
- 0267-8357 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3804
- OpenAlex
- W2163699185
- Cited by
- 1,063
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mutage/18.1.45
- The paper
- Hartmann, A. (2003). Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. Mutagenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/18.1.45
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.