Cited by 120Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentNanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsGraphene and Nanomaterials Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

In vitro genotoxicity testing of four reference metal nanomaterials, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, cerium oxide and silver: towards reliable hazard assessment

Open access
El Yamani, Naouale, Collins, Andrew R., Rundén-Pran, Elise, Fjellsbø, Lise Marie, Shaposhnikov, Sergey, Zielonddiny, Shanbeh, Dusinska, Maria·2017·Mutagenesis

Abstract

There is serious concern about the potential harmful effects of certain nanomaterials (NMs), on account of their ability to penetrate cell membranes and the increased reactivity that results from their increased surface area compared with bulk chemicals. To assess the safety of NMs, reliable tests are needed. We have investigated the possible genotoxicity of four representative NMs, derived from titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, cerium oxide and silver, in two human cell lines, A549 alveolar epithelial cells and lymphoblastoid TK6 cells. A high-throughput version of the comet assay was used to measure DNA strand beaks (SBs) as well as oxidised purines (converted to breaks with the enzyme formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase). In parallel, cytotoxicity was measured with the alamarBlue® assay, and the ability of NM-treated cells to survive was assessed by their colony-forming efficiency. TiO2 and CeO2 NMs were only slightly cytotoxic by the alamarBlue® test, and had no long-term effect on colony-forming efficiency. However, both induced DNA damage at non-cytotoxic concentrations; the damage decreased from 3 to 24-h exposure, except in the case of CeO2-treated A549 cells. ZnO and Ag NMs affected cell survival, and induced high levels of DNA damage at cytotoxic concentrations. At lower concentrations, there was significant damage, which tended to persist over 24 h. The implication is that all four reference metal NMs tested—whether cytotoxic or not—are genotoxic. A full assessment of NM toxicity should include tests on different cell types, different times of incubation and a wide range of (especially non-cytotoxic) concentrations; a test for cell viability should be performed in parallel. Inclusion of Fpg in the comet assay allows detection of indirect genotoxic effects via oxidative stress.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mutage/gew060

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Ekkapongpisit, 2012, Biocompatibility, endocytosis, and intracellular trafficking of mesoporous silica and polystyrene nanoparticles in ovarian cancer cells: effects of size and surface charge groups, Int. J. Nanomed, 7, 4147
  2. 10.1002/smll.200901158 · DOI
  3. 10.1186/s12989-014-0065-1 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/mutage/geu077 · DOI
  5. Manke, 2013, Mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress and toxicity, Biomed. Res. Int, 2013, 942916, 10.1155/2013/942916 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/toxsci/kfj197 · DOI
  7. De Stefano, 2012, Nanomaterials toxicity and cell death modalities, J. Drug Deliv, 2012, 167896, 10.1155/2012/167896 · DOI
  8. Cowie, 2015, Suitability of human and mammalian cells of different origin for the assessment of genotoxicity of metal and polymeric engineered nanoparticles, Nanotoxicology, 9, 57, 10.3109/17435390.2014.940407 · DOI
  9. Dusinska, 2015, Towards an alternative testing strategy for nanomaterials used in nanomedicine: lessons from NanoTEST, Nanotoxicology, 9, 118, 10.3109/17435390.2014.991431 · DOI
  10. Collins A. R. Annangi B. Rubio L. . (2016) High throughput toxicity screening and intracellular detection of nanomaterials. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology.
  11. 10.3109/17435390.2013.816797 · DOI
  12. 10.1186/s12989-015-0100-x · DOI
  13. Ponti, 2010, Colony Forming Efficiency and microscopy analysis of multi-wall carbon nanotubes cell interaction, Toxicol. Lett, 197, 29, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.04.018 · DOI
  14. 10.1039/c0nr00618a · DOI
  15. Dusinska, 2009, Testing strategies for the safety of nanoparticles used in medical applications, Nanomedicine (Lond), 4, 605, 10.2217/nnm.09.47 · DOI
  16. Catalán J. Suhonen S. Huk A. and Dusinska M . (2014) Analysis of nanoparticle-induced DNA damage by the comet assay. Genotoxicity DNA Repair, 241–268. · DOI
  17. 10.3109/17435390.2013.829590 · DOI
  18. Sasaki K. Huk A. Yamani N. E. Tanaka N. and Dusinska M . (2014) Bhas 42 Cell Transformation Assay for Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens. In Sierra M. L. and Gaivão I . (eds.), Genotoxicity and DNA Repair: A Practical Approach. Springer, New York, NY, pp. 343–362. · DOI
  19. Demir, 2015, Genotoxic and cell-transforming effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, Environ. Res, 136, 300, 10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.032 · DOI
  20. 10.3109/17435390.2011.629747 · DOI
  21. Sekar, 2014, DNA damage and repair following In vitro exposure to two different forms of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on trout erythrocyte, Environ. Toxicol, 29, 117, 10.1002/tox.20778 · DOI
  22. Ursini, 2014, Differences in cytotoxic, genotoxic, and inflammatory response of bronchial and alveolar human lung epithelial cells to pristine and COOH-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes, Biomed. Res. Int, 2014, 359506, 10.1155/2014/359506 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/jat.3038 · DOI
  24. Cavallo, 2015, Investigation on cobalt-oxide nanoparticles cyto-genotoxicity and inflammatory response in two types of respiratory cells, J. Appl. Toxicol, 35, 1102, 10.1002/jat.3133 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
El Yamani, N., Collins, A. R., Rundén-Pran, E., Fjellsbø, L. M., Shaposhnikov, S., Zielonddiny, S., & Dusinska, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • NILU (NO)
  • Comet Biotech (Norway) (NO)
Venue
Mutagenesis
Published
2016-11-12
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
117-126
ISSN
  • 0267-8357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3804
OpenAlex
W2552483231
Cited by
120
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Mutagenesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (acceptedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
Keywords
metal nanomaterials, genotoxicity, in vitro genotoxicity testing, titanium dioxide nanoparticles, zinc oxide nanoparticles, cerium oxide nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles, DNA strand breaks, formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase, cytotoxicity, plating efficiency, oxidative stress, A549 cells, TK6 cells, hazard assessment
MeSH terms
Cell Line, Cell Survival, DNA, DNA Damage, Humans, Oxidative Stress, Comet Assay, Escherichia coli Proteins, DNA-Formamidopyrimidine Glycosylase, Metal Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review