The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for ‘rare’ codons
Open accessAbstract
It has often been suggested that differential usage of codons recognized by rare tRNA species, i.e. "rare codons", represents an evolutionary strategy to modulate gene expression. In particular, regulatory genes are reported to have an extraordinarily high frequency of rare codons. From E. coli we have compiled codon usage data for highly expressed genes, moderately/lowly expressed genes, and regulatory genes. We have identified a clear and general trend in codon usage bias, from the very high bias seen in very highly expressed genes and attributed to selection, to a rather low bias in other genes which seems to be more influenced by mutation than by selection. There is no clear tendency for an increased frequency of rare codons in the regulatory genes, compared to a large group of other moderately/lowly expressed genes with low codon bias. From this, as well as a consideration of evolutionary rates of regulatory genes, and of experimental data on translation rates, we conclude that the pattern of synonymous codon usage in regulatory genes reflects primarily the relaxation of natural selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sharp, P. M., & Li, W.-H. (1987) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/15.3.1281 · Cited by 3,992
Self-citationInitial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome
The Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04072 · Cited by 2,459
Sharp, P. M., Cowe, E., Higgins, D. G., Shields, D. C., Wolfe, K. H., & Wright, F. (1988) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/16.17.8207 · Cited by 594
Self-citationBremer, H., & Dennis, P. P. (2008) · EcoSal Plus · doi:10.1128/ecosal.5.2.3 · Cited by 539
Absolute in vivo translation rates of individual codons in Escherichia coli
Sørensen, M. A., & Pedersen, S. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)90211-n · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharp, P. M., & Li, W.-H.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7737-7749
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2152812151
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for ‘rare’ codons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/14.19.7737
- The paper
- Sharp, P. M., & Li, W.-H. (1986). Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for ‘rare’ codons. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/14.19.7737
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.