Sequence analysis suggests that tetra-nucleotides signal the termination of protein synthesis in eukaryotes
Open accessAbstract
An increasing number of cases where tri-nucleotide stop codons do not signal the termination of protein synthesis are being reported. In order to identify what constitutes an efficient stop signal, we analysed the region around natural stop codons in genes from a wide variety of eukaryotic species and gene families. Certain stop codons and nucleotides following stop codons are over-represented, and this pattern is accentuated in highly expressed genes. For example, the preferred signal for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Drosophila melanogaster highly expressed genes is UAAG, and generally the signals UAA(A/G) and UGA(A/G) are preferred in eukaryotes. The GC% of the organism or DNA region can affect whether there is A or G in the second or fourth positions. We suggest therefore, that the stop codon and the nucleotide following it comprise a tetra-nucleotide stop signal. A model is proposed in which the polypeptide chain release factor, a protein, recognises this sequence, but will tolerate some substitution, particularly A to G in the second or third positions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The translation termination signal is more than a stop codon, including the downstream +4 site (tetranucleotide stop signal).
“It has long been recognized that the translation termination signal is more than a stop codon [86,87], leading to an early proposal of tetranucleotide stop signal including the downstream +4 site [63,65,87,88].”
From Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines (2021) · cites this paper as [88]
Cites
Sharp, P. M., & Li, W.-H. (1987) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/15.3.1281 · Cited by 3,992 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines
Xia, X. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9070734 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brown, C. M., Stockwell, P. A., Trotman, C. N. A., & Tate, W. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Chris M.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 6339-6345
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- PMC
- PMC332501
- OpenAlex
- W2049734985
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Keywords
- stop codon, translation termination, unnatural amino acids, UGA, UAG, GC content, highly expressed genes, release factors, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Codon, Drosophila melanogaster, Escherichia coli, Multigene Family, Humans, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptide Chain Termination, Translational, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review